This article reveals how the AKP’s use of clientelism contributes to its electoral dominance. It does so by examining the features and actors as well as the structure of the clientelist network. The arguments are based on fieldwork in one of the poorest and most densely populated districts of Bağcılar, where in the 2015 legislative elections the AKP achieved more votes than in any other district in Istanbul.Introduction Concept of clientelism Method and case selection Features of the AKP's clientelism The actors The structure Conclusion Notes Reference
This chapter explores whether and how the incumbent party in Turkey benefits electorally from its pa...
Thesis (S.M. and S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2009.Incl...
The empirical puzzle asks, ‘Why did the AKP lose the 2019 mayoral elections in its strongholds Istan...
This article reviews the existing body of scholarship and draws on original qualitative research tha...
The aim of this thesis is to develop a number of theoretical ideas about the emergence of the predom...
Clientelistic vote mobilization is a prominent electoral strategy in many of the world’s democracie...
Contemporary political parties often use state resources to win elections. In this context, electora...
This paper discusses the role of the electoral system in making the Justice and Development Party (A...
While clientelism is most often viewed as a symptom of traditional politics, empirical evidence sugg...
This article explains the varieties of clientelistic vote exchange in contemporary electoral democra...
Political parties’ control over state resources clearly has an impact on the parties’ internal organ...
This article seeks to explain the endurance of populist parties in power by focusing on the case of ...
How does electoral competition shape parties’ use of clientelist strategies during elections? In thi...
In this chapter, we analyze voter mobilization through canvassing prior to the 2018 general election...
“Party hegemony” is a macro-level characteristic of party systems, which is a product of persistent ...
This chapter explores whether and how the incumbent party in Turkey benefits electorally from its pa...
Thesis (S.M. and S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2009.Incl...
The empirical puzzle asks, ‘Why did the AKP lose the 2019 mayoral elections in its strongholds Istan...
This article reviews the existing body of scholarship and draws on original qualitative research tha...
The aim of this thesis is to develop a number of theoretical ideas about the emergence of the predom...
Clientelistic vote mobilization is a prominent electoral strategy in many of the world’s democracie...
Contemporary political parties often use state resources to win elections. In this context, electora...
This paper discusses the role of the electoral system in making the Justice and Development Party (A...
While clientelism is most often viewed as a symptom of traditional politics, empirical evidence sugg...
This article explains the varieties of clientelistic vote exchange in contemporary electoral democra...
Political parties’ control over state resources clearly has an impact on the parties’ internal organ...
This article seeks to explain the endurance of populist parties in power by focusing on the case of ...
How does electoral competition shape parties’ use of clientelist strategies during elections? In thi...
In this chapter, we analyze voter mobilization through canvassing prior to the 2018 general election...
“Party hegemony” is a macro-level characteristic of party systems, which is a product of persistent ...
This chapter explores whether and how the incumbent party in Turkey benefits electorally from its pa...
Thesis (S.M. and S.B.)--Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Dept. of Political Science, 2009.Incl...
The empirical puzzle asks, ‘Why did the AKP lose the 2019 mayoral elections in its strongholds Istan...