When a leading state such as Illinois enacts reform legislation, an impact on the legislatures of other jurisdictions may be anticipated. Accordingly, a need exists for an examination of this legislation in the light of the common-law background of grand jury secrecy and for a further analysis of it in the face of the growing trend toward more liberalized discovery of grand jury minutes in other jurisdictions. It is the contention of the author that such an empirical study will demonstrate that this legislation adopted by Illinois is contrary to all modern judicial thinking and is, in fact, a retrogressive step toward a period long outdated; that it facilitates serious abuses inherent in granting to the prosecution sole control over the u...
This Note analyzes the controversy and concludes that the latter courts are correct: Congress never ...
The shameful state of contemporary federal grand jury practice has attracted the attention of many s...
The implications of recent decisions of the Supreme Court which have given new and expanded meanings...
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) functionally binds everyone who is present during grand jury...
The scope of this study is limited to what is probably the most criticized aspect of the traditional...
Grand jury proceedings are shrouded in secrecy. No judge presides over them, no reporter annotates t...
Part I examines the courts\u27 current certainty-based perspective, and rejects this approach becaus...
The investigations of local police officers for causing the deaths of unarmed civilians in Ferguson,...
Grand Jury 2.0: Modern Perspectives on the Grand Jury challenges the American legal culture to re-im...
For the first 150 years of our constitutional history, a valid grand jury indictment was deemed to b...
The grand jury possesses an unqualified power to decline to indict - despite probable cause that all...
This report discusses the history and current role of the federal grand jury in the American crimina...
Although it had been previously recognized that a defendant was entitled to inspect grand jury testi...
WHILE denying the traditional virtues of grand juries and discrediting them as wielders of the power...
The right of a grand jury to report on the actions of public officials and on general conditions in ...
This Note analyzes the controversy and concludes that the latter courts are correct: Congress never ...
The shameful state of contemporary federal grand jury practice has attracted the attention of many s...
The implications of recent decisions of the Supreme Court which have given new and expanded meanings...
Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 6(e) functionally binds everyone who is present during grand jury...
The scope of this study is limited to what is probably the most criticized aspect of the traditional...
Grand jury proceedings are shrouded in secrecy. No judge presides over them, no reporter annotates t...
Part I examines the courts\u27 current certainty-based perspective, and rejects this approach becaus...
The investigations of local police officers for causing the deaths of unarmed civilians in Ferguson,...
Grand Jury 2.0: Modern Perspectives on the Grand Jury challenges the American legal culture to re-im...
For the first 150 years of our constitutional history, a valid grand jury indictment was deemed to b...
The grand jury possesses an unqualified power to decline to indict - despite probable cause that all...
This report discusses the history and current role of the federal grand jury in the American crimina...
Although it had been previously recognized that a defendant was entitled to inspect grand jury testi...
WHILE denying the traditional virtues of grand juries and discrediting them as wielders of the power...
The right of a grand jury to report on the actions of public officials and on general conditions in ...
This Note analyzes the controversy and concludes that the latter courts are correct: Congress never ...
The shameful state of contemporary federal grand jury practice has attracted the attention of many s...
The implications of recent decisions of the Supreme Court which have given new and expanded meanings...