A set of 1.4 million biomedical papers was analyzed with regards to how often articles are mentioned on Twitter or saved by users on Mendeley. While Twitter is a microblogging platform used by a general audience to distribute information, Mendeley is a reference manager targeted at an academic user group to organize scholarly literature. Both platforms are used as sources for so-called “altmetrics” to measure a new kind of research impact. This analysis shows in how far they differ and compare to traditional citation impact metrics based on a large set of PubMed papers
A number of new metrics based on social media platforms—grouped under the term “altmetrics”—have rec...
The availability of indicators based on social media has opened the possibility to track the online ...
An analysis of article-level metrics of 27,856 PLOS ONE articles reveals that the number of tweets w...
A set of 1.4 million biomedical papers was analyzed with regards to how often articles are mentioned...
<p>A set of 1.4 million biomedical papers was analyzed with regards to how often articles are mentio...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyze the disciplinary orientation of scientific publica...
This paper explores readership counts provided by the social reference manager Mendeley as a source ...
Data collected by social media platforms have been introduced as new sources for indicators to help ...
This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Wiley-Blackwell in Journal of the Associat...
<div><p>A number of new metrics based on social media platforms—grouped under the term “altmetrics”—...
A number of new metrics based on social media platforms--grouped under the term "altmetrics"--have r...
This work was supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Grant #2014-3-25, Leiden University Fund (...
<p><em>Data and figures for paper published in PLOS ONE</em></p> <p><strong>Abstract. </strong>A num...
The relationship between traditional metrics of research impact (e.g., number of citations) and alte...
Changes are occurring in scholarly communication as scientific discourse and research activities spr...
A number of new metrics based on social media platforms—grouped under the term “altmetrics”—have rec...
The availability of indicators based on social media has opened the possibility to track the online ...
An analysis of article-level metrics of 27,856 PLOS ONE articles reveals that the number of tweets w...
A set of 1.4 million biomedical papers was analyzed with regards to how often articles are mentioned...
<p>A set of 1.4 million biomedical papers was analyzed with regards to how often articles are mentio...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to analyze the disciplinary orientation of scientific publica...
This paper explores readership counts provided by the social reference manager Mendeley as a source ...
Data collected by social media platforms have been introduced as new sources for indicators to help ...
This is an accepted manuscript of an article published by Wiley-Blackwell in Journal of the Associat...
<div><p>A number of new metrics based on social media platforms—grouped under the term “altmetrics”—...
A number of new metrics based on social media platforms--grouped under the term "altmetrics"--have r...
This work was supported by the Alfred P. Sloan Foundation Grant #2014-3-25, Leiden University Fund (...
<p><em>Data and figures for paper published in PLOS ONE</em></p> <p><strong>Abstract. </strong>A num...
The relationship between traditional metrics of research impact (e.g., number of citations) and alte...
Changes are occurring in scholarly communication as scientific discourse and research activities spr...
A number of new metrics based on social media platforms—grouped under the term “altmetrics”—have rec...
The availability of indicators based on social media has opened the possibility to track the online ...
An analysis of article-level metrics of 27,856 PLOS ONE articles reveals that the number of tweets w...