We consider non-cooperative environments in which two players have the power to commit but cannot sign binding agreements. We show that by committing to a set of actions rather than to a single action, players can implement a wide range of action profiles. We give a complete characterization of implementable profiles and provide a simple method to find them. Profiles implementable by bilateral commitments are shown to be generically inefficient. Surprisingly, allowing for gradualism (i.e., step by step commitment) does not change the set of implementable profile
Why are people inclined to build friendships and maintain durable, nonreproductive relationships? Pr...
Consider an agent (manager,artist, etc.) who has imperfect private information about his productivit...
Both conventional wisdom and empirical evidence suggest that arranging a prior commitment or agreeme...
We consider non-cooperative environments in which two players have the power to commit but cannot si...
Abstract. Real world players often increase their payo¤s by voluntarily com-mitting to play a \u85xe...
Real world players often increase their payoffs by voluntarily committing to play a fixed strategy, ...
We study the role of commitment as a source of strategic power in a non-cooperative bargaining game....
We propose a new model to study the role of commitment as a source of strategic bargaining power. Tw...
We regard simulation as a set of interaction episodes between partaking agents in an agent-based s...
Abstract. This paper investigates the e¤ects of commitments to rule out strategies on the analy-sis ...
Commitments have been shown to promote cooperation if, on the one hand, they can be sufficiently enf...
Commitments have been shown to promote cooperation if, on the one hand, they can be suffi-ciently en...
An informed and an uninformed agent both contribute to a joint coordination game such that their act...
Agents make commitments towards others in order to influ-ence others in a certain way, often by dism...
A prominent explanation of cooperation in repeated exchange is reciprocity (e.g. Axelrod 1984). Howe...
Why are people inclined to build friendships and maintain durable, nonreproductive relationships? Pr...
Consider an agent (manager,artist, etc.) who has imperfect private information about his productivit...
Both conventional wisdom and empirical evidence suggest that arranging a prior commitment or agreeme...
We consider non-cooperative environments in which two players have the power to commit but cannot si...
Abstract. Real world players often increase their payo¤s by voluntarily com-mitting to play a \u85xe...
Real world players often increase their payoffs by voluntarily committing to play a fixed strategy, ...
We study the role of commitment as a source of strategic power in a non-cooperative bargaining game....
We propose a new model to study the role of commitment as a source of strategic bargaining power. Tw...
We regard simulation as a set of interaction episodes between partaking agents in an agent-based s...
Abstract. This paper investigates the e¤ects of commitments to rule out strategies on the analy-sis ...
Commitments have been shown to promote cooperation if, on the one hand, they can be sufficiently enf...
Commitments have been shown to promote cooperation if, on the one hand, they can be suffi-ciently en...
An informed and an uninformed agent both contribute to a joint coordination game such that their act...
Agents make commitments towards others in order to influ-ence others in a certain way, often by dism...
A prominent explanation of cooperation in repeated exchange is reciprocity (e.g. Axelrod 1984). Howe...
Why are people inclined to build friendships and maintain durable, nonreproductive relationships? Pr...
Consider an agent (manager,artist, etc.) who has imperfect private information about his productivit...
Both conventional wisdom and empirical evidence suggest that arranging a prior commitment or agreeme...