Add to ORKG[Extract] A recent decision in the New South Wales Supreme Court found that Ms Edwards, the wife of a deceased man had a possessory interest in his sperm, removed after his untimely death. The decision is interesting to property lawyers for a number of reasons. First, it discusses at some length the nature of the interest found to vest in the applicant wife. Secondly, it highlights the challenges involved in identifying rights in the human body, or parts of it, in favour of third parties
In Eisenstadt v. Baird, the Supreme Court held that a state law prohibiting the provision of contrac...
This editorial considers the issue of posthumous conception as discussed in the case of Re H, AE (No...
In a 2012 case from Canada, the Supreme Court of British Columbia held that sperm acquired and store...
[Extract] A recent decision in the New South Wales Supreme Court found that Ms Edwards, the wife of ...
In May 2011, the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Jocelyn Edwards; re the estate of the late Mark...
In May 2011, the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Jocelyn Edwards; re the estate of the late Mark...
A tragic workplace accident led in 2010 to the death of Mark Edwards. Subsequently, his wife Joycely...
In this case we must decide whether a widow has the right to use her late husband\u27s frozen sperm ...
Just as there are moral and ethical implication in permitting the widow to use a sperm deposit for A...
The question of when property rights may arise in human body parts or bodily products remains contro...
In 1993 California courts considered a case of first impression in America: whether a man has the ri...
During the late 1990s and early 2000s, an unprecedented story unfolded in the UK media involving a y...
This paper is concerned with the English Court of Appeal’s decision in Yearworth v North Bristol NHS...
In Bazley v Wesley Monash IVF Pty Ltd [2010] QSC 118 an order was made under r 250 of the Uniform Ci...
medethics-2013-101449 This paper is concerned with the English Court of Appeal’s decision in Yearwor...
In Eisenstadt v. Baird, the Supreme Court held that a state law prohibiting the provision of contrac...
This editorial considers the issue of posthumous conception as discussed in the case of Re H, AE (No...
In a 2012 case from Canada, the Supreme Court of British Columbia held that sperm acquired and store...
[Extract] A recent decision in the New South Wales Supreme Court found that Ms Edwards, the wife of ...
In May 2011, the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Jocelyn Edwards; re the estate of the late Mark...
In May 2011, the Supreme Court of New South Wales in Jocelyn Edwards; re the estate of the late Mark...
A tragic workplace accident led in 2010 to the death of Mark Edwards. Subsequently, his wife Joycely...
In this case we must decide whether a widow has the right to use her late husband\u27s frozen sperm ...
Just as there are moral and ethical implication in permitting the widow to use a sperm deposit for A...
The question of when property rights may arise in human body parts or bodily products remains contro...
In 1993 California courts considered a case of first impression in America: whether a man has the ri...
During the late 1990s and early 2000s, an unprecedented story unfolded in the UK media involving a y...
This paper is concerned with the English Court of Appeal’s decision in Yearworth v North Bristol NHS...
In Bazley v Wesley Monash IVF Pty Ltd [2010] QSC 118 an order was made under r 250 of the Uniform Ci...
medethics-2013-101449 This paper is concerned with the English Court of Appeal’s decision in Yearwor...
In Eisenstadt v. Baird, the Supreme Court held that a state law prohibiting the provision of contrac...
This editorial considers the issue of posthumous conception as discussed in the case of Re H, AE (No...
In a 2012 case from Canada, the Supreme Court of British Columbia held that sperm acquired and store...