[Extract] Early this year, the Supreme Court of New South Wales handed down its decision in Ashton v Pratt. This was an action by Ms Ashton to enforce a promise made by Richard Pratt - director of Visy Industries and well known philanthropist. The Court accepted (though somewhat reluctantly it seems) that Mr Pratt had told Ms Ashton that he would establish trusts of $2.5 million for each of her two children, pay her an allowance of $500,000 per year, pay up to $36,000 per annum for rental accommodation for her, and pay $30,000 per annum for her business expenses, particularly travel. [para 28]
On 14 November 2006 the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in a case simply described ...
[Extract] Dame Elisabeth Murdoch was an income beneficiary of several Murdoch family trusts. Pursuan...
The Western Cape Division of the High Court in Cape Town handed down the judgment in the Women’s Leg...
[Extract] A recent decision in the New South Wales Supreme Court found that Ms Edwards, the wife of ...
A family law financial agreement made pursuant to pt VIIIA for parties to a marriage and pt VIIIAB f...
As in other jurisdictions, Australia has recently witnessed a novel action in deceit seeking damages...
On Friday, 28 July 2000, Justice Sundberg of the Federal Court of Australia handed down his decision...
The Supreme Court has had a very big year. Decisions from the Court’s most recent term, which ended ...
On May 5, 1993, the Texas Supreme Court handed down Boyles v. Kerr, which eliminated negligent infli...
The article focuses on the opinion of the Australian High Court on the doctrine of informed consent ...
In April 2011, Lindsay Kamakahi caused an international stir by suing the American Society for Repro...
The Federal Court's decision in the McBain case(1) is analysed in the Research Note McBain v State o...
This case note critiques the recent decision of the High Court of Australia in PGA v. The Queen (201...
In one of its last opinions of the 2010 term, the U.S. Supreme Court decided, in Stern v. Marshall, ...
[Extract] A couple of weeks ago, Justice Henry of the Queensland Supreme Court handed down judgement...
On 14 November 2006 the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in a case simply described ...
[Extract] Dame Elisabeth Murdoch was an income beneficiary of several Murdoch family trusts. Pursuan...
The Western Cape Division of the High Court in Cape Town handed down the judgment in the Women’s Leg...
[Extract] A recent decision in the New South Wales Supreme Court found that Ms Edwards, the wife of ...
A family law financial agreement made pursuant to pt VIIIA for parties to a marriage and pt VIIIAB f...
As in other jurisdictions, Australia has recently witnessed a novel action in deceit seeking damages...
On Friday, 28 July 2000, Justice Sundberg of the Federal Court of Australia handed down his decision...
The Supreme Court has had a very big year. Decisions from the Court’s most recent term, which ended ...
On May 5, 1993, the Texas Supreme Court handed down Boyles v. Kerr, which eliminated negligent infli...
The article focuses on the opinion of the Australian High Court on the doctrine of informed consent ...
In April 2011, Lindsay Kamakahi caused an international stir by suing the American Society for Repro...
The Federal Court's decision in the McBain case(1) is analysed in the Research Note McBain v State o...
This case note critiques the recent decision of the High Court of Australia in PGA v. The Queen (201...
In one of its last opinions of the 2010 term, the U.S. Supreme Court decided, in Stern v. Marshall, ...
[Extract] A couple of weeks ago, Justice Henry of the Queensland Supreme Court handed down judgement...
On 14 November 2006 the High Court of Australia handed down its decision in a case simply described ...
[Extract] Dame Elisabeth Murdoch was an income beneficiary of several Murdoch family trusts. Pursuan...
The Western Cape Division of the High Court in Cape Town handed down the judgment in the Women’s Leg...