Genesis, tectonic setting- and exploration: considerations for Fe-oxide Cu Au deposits, Mount Isa Eastern Succession

Based on the geochemistry of mafic rocks, the Palaeo-Mesoproterozoic\ud eastern margins of the North and South Australian Cratons can be classified into the\ud Eastern Domain (Mount Isa Eastern Succession, Curnamona Province and\ud Georgetown Inlier) and Western Domain (Mount Isa Western Succession, Kalkadoon-\ud Leichhardt Belt and McArthur River Basin). Basaltic magmatism of the Eastern\ud Domain was synchronous with back arc basinal development, while Western Domain\ud magmas were emplaced into a thicker continental crust. This difference is reflected in\ud the metallogenic nature of the domains, whereby Fe-oxide-Cu-Au (IOCG) and\ud Broken Hill Type (BHT-type) deposits dominates the Eastern Domain, and stratiform\ud Pb-Zn-Ag and Mount Isa Style Cu-Pb-Zn(Ag) are found in the Western Domain.\ud Based on the distinct evolutionary trends for mafic magmas of the domains of\ud Mesoproterozoic Australia, we suggest that the Mount Isa Western Succession and\ud McArthur River Basin continue to be recognised as part of the North Australian\ud Craton. While the Mount Isa Eastern Succession, Curnamona Province and the\ud Georgetown Inlier be referred to as the East Australian Craton. An actively or\ud formerly subducted slab sitting in the mantle lithosphere to the east of the eastern\ud margin of the East Australian Craton may have provided the appropriate mantle\ud chemistry to contribute to subsequent generation, in an extended continent, of\ud magmas and volcano-sedimentary input that led to the formation of Mesoproterozoic\ud IOCG and BHT deposits.\ud \ud In the Mount Isa Eastern Succession, mafic rocks and magmas contributed\ud sulphur and metals to IOCG ore deposition over a protracted (~170My) period.\ud Between 1686 Ma and 1660Ma, S and metals (Cu, Au, Zn, Fe, Ni, Co) were exsolved \ud from crystallising strongly fractioned back-arc tholeiitic magmas into active\ud extensional faults, and surrounding country rocks. During Isan peak-metamorphism,\ud at ~1600Ma-1580Ma, significant amounts of S, Cu, Au, Zn, Ni, Co and Cr were\ud leached from mafic rocks and crustal accumulations, and led to the deposition of early\ud IOCG and base metal deposits. Subsequent albitic alteration associated with the\ud hydrothermal fluids of the ~1550Ma-1490Ma Williams-Naraku Batholith may also\ud have sequestered sulphide material from mafic rocks. This study highlights the\ud possibility that the previously held consensus that the Williams-Naraku Batholith of\ud felsic-intermediate magmas contributed the bulk of the metals to the Eastern\ud Succession mineral deposits, may not necessarily be the case, but rather, fluids\ud derived from these magmas remobilised previously existing mafic derived metal\ud accumulations.\ud \ud Protracted metal and sulphur contributions to the Mount Isa Eastern\ud Succession Iron oxide-Cu-Au (IOCG) province occurred primarily as a consequence\ud of long-lived fluid and melt fluxes from the base of the crust, stimulated by initial\ud back-arc emplacement of voluminous mafic magmas. The concentration of sulphur,\ud iron, copper and gold into the presently observed mineral deposits involved a\ud significant component of remobilisation and reworking of early initial enrichments\ud (pre- to syn-Isan Orogeny) by later fluids (syn- to post-Isan and syn-Williams/Naraku\ud Batholith). Osborne (eastern domain) and Eloise-type ores formed or were strongly\ud remobilized at c. 1600 Ma by reduced, mafic-derived fluids, whereas oxidised brines\ud released by the Williams/Naraku granitoids overprinted magnetite ± sulphides at\ud Osborne (western domain) and Starra to produce younger (c. 1530 Ma) hematitechalcopyrite\ud associations. CO2-rich, potentially mantle-derived fluid may have\ud periodically pulsed through the system, manifest now as pyrrhotite-stable carbonate \ud veins and pods. Exploration for Ernest Henry and Starra style deposits should focus\ud on recognition of oxidised corridors in relation to mafic- proximal and structurally defined\ud targets, However, the possibility remains that large, early mafic rock related\ud Cu-Au ± (Fe, Co, Ni, Zn) deposits are preserved distal to the oxidising effects of the\ud Williams-Naraku hydrothermal system, and may also present exploration\ud opportunities.\ud \ud Within the southern portion of the Mount Isa Eastern Succession, mafic rocks,\ud and faults that intersect areas of mafic rocks, exhibit the strongest spatial relationship\ud to IOCG mineralisation than any other geological unit. In contrast, felsic rocks, of\ud which both genetic and exploration models have relied heavily upon in the past in\ud order to explain the final localisation controls on IOCG deposits, do not display a\ud significant relationship to mineralisation. The results attained call for an immediate\ud review of exploration practices in the Eastern Succession, and call upon more mafic related\ud models in order to achieve sustainable IOCG mineral discoveries