International audienceIn the Bayesian paradigm, a common method for comparing two models is to compute the Bayes factor, defined as the ratio of their respective marginal likelihoods. In recent phylogenetic works, the numerical evaluation of marginal likelihoods has often been performed using the harmonic mean estimation procedure. In the present article, we propose to employ another method, based on an analogy with statistical physics, called thermodynamic integration. We describe the method, propose an implementation, and show on two analytical examples that this numerical method yields reliable estimates. In contrast, the harmonic mean estimator leads to a strong overestimation of the marginal likelihood, which is all the more pronounced...
Background Accurate model comparison requires extensive computation times, especially for parameter...
Bayesian model comparison involves the evaluation of the marginal likelihood, the expectation of the...
Summary. Bayes factors comparing two or more competing hypotheses are often estimated by constructin...
Abstract.—In the Bayesian paradigm, a common method for comparing two models is to compute the Bayes...
A Bayesian approach to model comparison based on the integrated or marginal likelihood is considered...
Bayesian phylogenetic methods are generating noticeable enthusiasm in the field of molecular systema...
There often are many alternative models of a biochemical system. Distinguishing models and finding t...
One of the more principled methods of performing model selection is via Bayes factors. However, calc...
One of the more principled methods of performing model selection is via Bayes factors. However, calc...
Abstract.—The marginal likelihood is commonly used for comparing different evolutionary models in Ba...
Thermodynamic integration (TI) for computing marginal likelihoods is based on an inverse annealing p...
Bayesian phylogenetic methods are generating noticeable enthusiasm in the field of molecular systema...
A typical goal in cognitive psychology is to select the model that provides the best explanation of ...
Abstract.—The marginal likelihood is commonly used for comparing different evolutionary models in Ba...
Background Accurate model comparison requires extensive computation times, especially for parameter...
Bayesian model comparison involves the evaluation of the marginal likelihood, the expectation of the...
Summary. Bayes factors comparing two or more competing hypotheses are often estimated by constructin...
Abstract.—In the Bayesian paradigm, a common method for comparing two models is to compute the Bayes...
A Bayesian approach to model comparison based on the integrated or marginal likelihood is considered...
Bayesian phylogenetic methods are generating noticeable enthusiasm in the field of molecular systema...
There often are many alternative models of a biochemical system. Distinguishing models and finding t...
One of the more principled methods of performing model selection is via Bayes factors. However, calc...
One of the more principled methods of performing model selection is via Bayes factors. However, calc...
Abstract.—The marginal likelihood is commonly used for comparing different evolutionary models in Ba...
Thermodynamic integration (TI) for computing marginal likelihoods is based on an inverse annealing p...
Bayesian phylogenetic methods are generating noticeable enthusiasm in the field of molecular systema...
A typical goal in cognitive psychology is to select the model that provides the best explanation of ...
Abstract.—The marginal likelihood is commonly used for comparing different evolutionary models in Ba...
Background Accurate model comparison requires extensive computation times, especially for parameter...
Bayesian model comparison involves the evaluation of the marginal likelihood, the expectation of the...
Summary. Bayes factors comparing two or more competing hypotheses are often estimated by constructin...