This is a very substantial essay reviewing Eric Voegelin’s use of terms such as ‘gnosis’, ‘gnostic’, ‘Gnosticism’. This is a key question for the Voegelin reception because his suggestion that ‘gnosticism’ was the ‘essence of modernity’ promoted him to the stardom of US political science in the 1950s. The essays shows that Voegelin’s work on ‘gnosticism’ is empirically wrong but still expresses a serious philosophical argument. The essay is based on archival research at the Eric Voegelin Papers (Stanford University) and draws on Voegelin’s published and unpublished writings, his letters (archived at Stanford) and the secondary literature on Voegelin
Panel 7 - Philosophies of History in Comparison Voegelin and Rosenstock-Huessy (Eric Voegelin Societ...
It is the primary aim of this dissertation to draw attention to Voegelin\u27s political philosophy a...
This essay examines the relationship between Eric Voegelin and Leo Strauss in order to show the cent...
This essay proposes an overview of some major topics to be found in the work of the Austro-American ...
The article examines the theorem of “articulation” as a key concept in Eric Voegelin’s work. It show...
The dissertation investigates the works of the German-American philosopher Eric Voegelin (1901-1985)...
The philosopher Eric Voegelin (1901-85) held that at the heart of an adequate political philosophy ...
The article discusses the project of the retheoretization of political science proposed by political...
This essay discusses the relevance of Aristoteles’s conception of human action and its metaphysical ...
Totalitarian ideologies are sometimes termed as political or secular religions because they use som...
Considering the topic of race and state, Eric Voegelin draws a distinction between race theories and...
In 1951 Eric Voegelin dedicated a long and very dense essay to the Utopia of Thomas More, subsequent...
ERIC VOEGELIN ON NATIONAL SOCIALISM. AN ATTEMPT AT PHILOSOPHICAL-AND-RELIGIOUS INTERPRETATION OF THE...
Eric Voegelin and Leo Strauss are two of the most provocative and durable political philosophers of ...
Hans Kelsens Critique of Eric Voegelins "New Science of Politics" has for a long time been very diff...
Panel 7 - Philosophies of History in Comparison Voegelin and Rosenstock-Huessy (Eric Voegelin Societ...
It is the primary aim of this dissertation to draw attention to Voegelin\u27s political philosophy a...
This essay examines the relationship between Eric Voegelin and Leo Strauss in order to show the cent...
This essay proposes an overview of some major topics to be found in the work of the Austro-American ...
The article examines the theorem of “articulation” as a key concept in Eric Voegelin’s work. It show...
The dissertation investigates the works of the German-American philosopher Eric Voegelin (1901-1985)...
The philosopher Eric Voegelin (1901-85) held that at the heart of an adequate political philosophy ...
The article discusses the project of the retheoretization of political science proposed by political...
This essay discusses the relevance of Aristoteles’s conception of human action and its metaphysical ...
Totalitarian ideologies are sometimes termed as political or secular religions because they use som...
Considering the topic of race and state, Eric Voegelin draws a distinction between race theories and...
In 1951 Eric Voegelin dedicated a long and very dense essay to the Utopia of Thomas More, subsequent...
ERIC VOEGELIN ON NATIONAL SOCIALISM. AN ATTEMPT AT PHILOSOPHICAL-AND-RELIGIOUS INTERPRETATION OF THE...
Eric Voegelin and Leo Strauss are two of the most provocative and durable political philosophers of ...
Hans Kelsens Critique of Eric Voegelins "New Science of Politics" has for a long time been very diff...
Panel 7 - Philosophies of History in Comparison Voegelin and Rosenstock-Huessy (Eric Voegelin Societ...
It is the primary aim of this dissertation to draw attention to Voegelin\u27s political philosophy a...
This essay examines the relationship between Eric Voegelin and Leo Strauss in order to show the cent...