Examines the House of Lords judgment in Cobbe v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd on whether an experienced property developer was entitled to relief on the basis of proprietary estoppel for the cost of obtaining planning permission to demolish an existing property and build new houses under a non-binding oral agreement. Sets out two requisite conditions needed when deciding whether estoppel existed. Considers whether unconscionability was a separate element in making a claim for proprietary estoppel. [From Legal Journals Index
PROPRIETARY ESTOPPEL: A NEW CHAPTER DAWNS?The decision of the Court of Appeal in Thorner v Major1 br...
Articles examines the issue as to how English Courts might best resolve the problem of dealing with ...
In a series of recent cases, courts have reasserted unconscionability as the basis of proprietary es...
This article argues in favour of a functional analysis of proprietary estoppel which focuses on the ...
The doctrine of proprietary estoppel is living in interesting times, having recently had only its se...
Analyses the House of Lords judgment in Cobbe v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd in relation to claims by...
The article asks whether there is scope for giving effect to informal land agreements by applying th...
The article considers the recent High Court decision in Howe v Gossop [2021] EWHC 637 (Ch), which hi...
The long-awaited Supreme Court ruling in Guest v Guest has provided a welcomed judgment on a core pr...
This article analyses the contrasting reasoning and outcomes in two cases concerning proprietary est...
The thesis discusses the issue of whether the doctrine of proprietary estoppel is sound in theory an...
Estoppel is a well-known defence against (or limitation on) the rei vindicatio. This would be the ca...
This article focuses on a particular aspect of the operation of proprietary estoppel: it asks when a...
Most of the case law on the entitlement to family assets is concerned with disputes concerning benef...
In the English system, the doctrine of proprietary estoppel prevents a legal owner from acting in a...
PROPRIETARY ESTOPPEL: A NEW CHAPTER DAWNS?The decision of the Court of Appeal in Thorner v Major1 br...
Articles examines the issue as to how English Courts might best resolve the problem of dealing with ...
In a series of recent cases, courts have reasserted unconscionability as the basis of proprietary es...
This article argues in favour of a functional analysis of proprietary estoppel which focuses on the ...
The doctrine of proprietary estoppel is living in interesting times, having recently had only its se...
Analyses the House of Lords judgment in Cobbe v Yeoman's Row Management Ltd in relation to claims by...
The article asks whether there is scope for giving effect to informal land agreements by applying th...
The article considers the recent High Court decision in Howe v Gossop [2021] EWHC 637 (Ch), which hi...
The long-awaited Supreme Court ruling in Guest v Guest has provided a welcomed judgment on a core pr...
This article analyses the contrasting reasoning and outcomes in two cases concerning proprietary est...
The thesis discusses the issue of whether the doctrine of proprietary estoppel is sound in theory an...
Estoppel is a well-known defence against (or limitation on) the rei vindicatio. This would be the ca...
This article focuses on a particular aspect of the operation of proprietary estoppel: it asks when a...
Most of the case law on the entitlement to family assets is concerned with disputes concerning benef...
In the English system, the doctrine of proprietary estoppel prevents a legal owner from acting in a...
PROPRIETARY ESTOPPEL: A NEW CHAPTER DAWNS?The decision of the Court of Appeal in Thorner v Major1 br...
Articles examines the issue as to how English Courts might best resolve the problem of dealing with ...
In a series of recent cases, courts have reasserted unconscionability as the basis of proprietary es...