Mariotti gratefully acknowledges financial support through a Leverhulme Fellowship. Both authors acknowledge financial support from the ESRC through grant RES-000-22-3474.In this paper we examine the problems facing a policy maker who observes inconsistent choices made by agents who are boundedly rational. We contrast a model-less and a model-based approach to welfare economics. We make the case for the model-based approach and examine its advantages as well as some problematic issues associated with it.PostprintPeer reviewe
We build a satisficing model of choice under risk which embeds Expected Utility Theory (EUT) into a ...
We build a satisficing model of choice under risk which embeds Expected Utility Theory (EUT) into a ...
Non-classical models of economic behaviour, usually summarised under the notion of 'Bounded Rational...
In this paper, we examine the problems facing a policy maker who observes inconsistent choices made ...
We propose a boundedly rational model of choice where agents cate-gorize alternatives before choosin...
If decision-makers (DMs) do not always do what is in their best interest, what do choices reveal abo...
This paper proposes a choice-theoretic framework for evaluating economic welfare with the following ...
Non-classical models of economic behaviour, usually summarised under the notion of 'Bounded Rational...
We propose a boundedly rational model of choice where agents categorize alternatives before choosing...
We propose a boundedly rational model of choice where agents categorize alternatives before choosing...
A number of different models with behavioral economics have a reduced form representation where pote...
Non-classical models of economic behaviour, usually summarised under the notion of 'Bounded Rational...
We build a satisficing model of choice under risk which embeds Expected Utility Theory (EUT) into a ...
Critics of economics often highlight two related issues: the empirical falsity of the ‘homo economic...
If you accept that evolved agents will be only boundedly rational, what are the consequences for the...
We build a satisficing model of choice under risk which embeds Expected Utility Theory (EUT) into a ...
We build a satisficing model of choice under risk which embeds Expected Utility Theory (EUT) into a ...
Non-classical models of economic behaviour, usually summarised under the notion of 'Bounded Rational...
In this paper, we examine the problems facing a policy maker who observes inconsistent choices made ...
We propose a boundedly rational model of choice where agents cate-gorize alternatives before choosin...
If decision-makers (DMs) do not always do what is in their best interest, what do choices reveal abo...
This paper proposes a choice-theoretic framework for evaluating economic welfare with the following ...
Non-classical models of economic behaviour, usually summarised under the notion of 'Bounded Rational...
We propose a boundedly rational model of choice where agents categorize alternatives before choosing...
We propose a boundedly rational model of choice where agents categorize alternatives before choosing...
A number of different models with behavioral economics have a reduced form representation where pote...
Non-classical models of economic behaviour, usually summarised under the notion of 'Bounded Rational...
We build a satisficing model of choice under risk which embeds Expected Utility Theory (EUT) into a ...
Critics of economics often highlight two related issues: the empirical falsity of the ‘homo economic...
If you accept that evolved agents will be only boundedly rational, what are the consequences for the...
We build a satisficing model of choice under risk which embeds Expected Utility Theory (EUT) into a ...
We build a satisficing model of choice under risk which embeds Expected Utility Theory (EUT) into a ...
Non-classical models of economic behaviour, usually summarised under the notion of 'Bounded Rational...