This paper analyzes the production of fundamental research as a coordination game played by scholars. In the model, scholars decide to adopt a new idea only if they believe that a critical mass of peers is following a similar research strategy. If researchers observe only a noisy idiosyncratic signal of the true scientifi c potential of a new idea, we show that the game presents a single threshold equilibrium. In this environment, fundamental research proceeds with large structural breaks followed by long periods of time in which new ideas are unsuccessful. The likelihood of a new idea emerging depends on various parameters, including the rewards of working in the old paradigm, the critical mass of researchers required to create a new schoo...
AbstractThe non-rivalness of scientific knowledge has traditionally underpinned its status as a publ...
Consistent confirmations obtained independently of each other lend credibility to a scientific resul...
The publish-or-perish paradigm is a prevailing facet of science. We apply game theory to show that, ...
This paper analyzes the production of fundamental research as a coordination game played by scholars...
We model academic competition as a game in which researchers ¯ght for priority. Researchers privatel...
We model academic competition as a game in which researchers ¯ght for priority. Researchers privatel...
This paper studies the dynamics of fundamental research. We develop a simple model where researchers...
This paper analyses the consequences of young researchers ’ scientific choice on the dynamics of sci...
This paper analyses the consequences of young researchers ' scientific choice on the dynamics o...
We address a recently posed question: ‘Why Do SoMany Astronomy (and Astrobiology) Discoveries Fail t...
<div><p>We develop here a multi-agent model of the creation of knowledge (scientific progress or tec...
We offer a model of scientific progress in which uncertainty resolves over time. We show that rivalr...
Since the 1950s, citation number or “impact” has been the dominant metric by which science is quanti...
What is the relative importance of internal versus contextual forces in the birth and death of scien...
Consistent confirmations obtained independently of each other lend credibility to a scientific resul...
AbstractThe non-rivalness of scientific knowledge has traditionally underpinned its status as a publ...
Consistent confirmations obtained independently of each other lend credibility to a scientific resul...
The publish-or-perish paradigm is a prevailing facet of science. We apply game theory to show that, ...
This paper analyzes the production of fundamental research as a coordination game played by scholars...
We model academic competition as a game in which researchers ¯ght for priority. Researchers privatel...
We model academic competition as a game in which researchers ¯ght for priority. Researchers privatel...
This paper studies the dynamics of fundamental research. We develop a simple model where researchers...
This paper analyses the consequences of young researchers ’ scientific choice on the dynamics of sci...
This paper analyses the consequences of young researchers ' scientific choice on the dynamics o...
We address a recently posed question: ‘Why Do SoMany Astronomy (and Astrobiology) Discoveries Fail t...
<div><p>We develop here a multi-agent model of the creation of knowledge (scientific progress or tec...
We offer a model of scientific progress in which uncertainty resolves over time. We show that rivalr...
Since the 1950s, citation number or “impact” has been the dominant metric by which science is quanti...
What is the relative importance of internal versus contextual forces in the birth and death of scien...
Consistent confirmations obtained independently of each other lend credibility to a scientific resul...
AbstractThe non-rivalness of scientific knowledge has traditionally underpinned its status as a publ...
Consistent confirmations obtained independently of each other lend credibility to a scientific resul...
The publish-or-perish paradigm is a prevailing facet of science. We apply game theory to show that, ...