This chapter describes the perspectives of faculty regarding decision making and oversight of intercollegiate athletics at Division I Football Bowl Subdivision institutions and the implications for institutional researchers.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/64564/1/317_ftp.pd
Intercollegiate athletics in the United States have continuously become more commercialized, pressur...
The purpose of this study was to investigate the attitudes of college athletic department administra...
This study focuses on the decision-making institutional leaders use during the process of conference...
Faculty members at institutions in three Division II conferences were surveyed regarding their opini...
The purpose of this study was to determine perceptions of faculty senators regarding intercollegiate...
Research faculty seldom study sports on their campuses. This paper identifies the constraints that i...
Recent reform initiatives have offered ideas for improving academic and financial oversight, but the...
Few studies have focused on faculty perceptions of intercollegiate athletics (Cockley & Roswal, 1994...
This study sought to determine if key constituent groups (students, faculty, alumni, and administrat...
Intercollegiate student - athletes in the United States are in an unusual position as both students ...
This study analyzed faculty attitudes towards intercollegiate athletics at a NCAA Division III insti...
This research seeks to understand the actual perception of the proper role of athletics on the part ...
Following an athletics scandal that invoked internal upheaval and National Collegiate Athletic Assoc...
The purpose of this study was to compare the attitudes of faculty at: (1) Division I NCAA and NAIA i...
Typescript (photocopy).The purpose of this study was to determine college and university administrat...
Intercollegiate athletics in the United States have continuously become more commercialized, pressur...
The purpose of this study was to investigate the attitudes of college athletic department administra...
This study focuses on the decision-making institutional leaders use during the process of conference...
Faculty members at institutions in three Division II conferences were surveyed regarding their opini...
The purpose of this study was to determine perceptions of faculty senators regarding intercollegiate...
Research faculty seldom study sports on their campuses. This paper identifies the constraints that i...
Recent reform initiatives have offered ideas for improving academic and financial oversight, but the...
Few studies have focused on faculty perceptions of intercollegiate athletics (Cockley & Roswal, 1994...
This study sought to determine if key constituent groups (students, faculty, alumni, and administrat...
Intercollegiate student - athletes in the United States are in an unusual position as both students ...
This study analyzed faculty attitudes towards intercollegiate athletics at a NCAA Division III insti...
This research seeks to understand the actual perception of the proper role of athletics on the part ...
Following an athletics scandal that invoked internal upheaval and National Collegiate Athletic Assoc...
The purpose of this study was to compare the attitudes of faculty at: (1) Division I NCAA and NAIA i...
Typescript (photocopy).The purpose of this study was to determine college and university administrat...
Intercollegiate athletics in the United States have continuously become more commercialized, pressur...
The purpose of this study was to investigate the attitudes of college athletic department administra...
This study focuses on the decision-making institutional leaders use during the process of conference...