In 2013, only seven months apart, the Appeals Chambers of the International Criminal Tribunal for the former Yugoslavia and the Special Court for Sierra Leone pronounced their judgments in the cases against Momčilo Perišić and Charles Taylor, respectively. Notably, the two Appeals Chambers applied diverging interpretations of the actus reus of aiding and abetting liability in international criminal law. This thesis explores whether there is a requirement of specific direction in the actus reus of aiding and abetting liability in international criminal law, by analyzing the Perišić and Taylor Judgments the issues that have been frequently debated in the period following the Perišić and Taylor Judgments
This article considers the suitability of employing particular modes of imputed criminal liability i...
Modes of liability, such as ordering, instigation, superior responsibility and joint criminal liabil...
More than a decade has passed since the establishment of the two ad hoc Tribunals, however, the juri...
On 28 February 2013, the ICTY Appeals Chamber acquitted Momčilo Perišić, former Chief of Staff of t...
Aiding and abetting has been recognised as a form of individual criminal responsibility since the 19...
It is not an overstatement to posit that international criminal law (ICL) has never seen anything qu...
On 28 February 2013, the ICTY Appeals Chamber acquitted Momčilo Perišić, former Chief of Staff of th...
After discussing the notion of ‘fragmentation’ and the value of using the metaphor in the context of...
This note introduces a controversial ICTY decision which attempted to clarify the requisite elements...
This note introduces a controversial ICTY decision which attempted to clarify the requisite elements...
Presently, many of the greatest debates and controversies in international criminal law concern mode...
Presently, many of the greatest debates and controversies in international criminal law concern mode...
Recognising the needs of victims in international criminal justice, the ICC has introduced an innova...
This article addresses the well-known problem of establishing individual criminal responsibility for...
This article considers the suitability of employing particular modes of imputed criminal liability i...
Modes of liability, such as ordering, instigation, superior responsibility and joint criminal liabil...
More than a decade has passed since the establishment of the two ad hoc Tribunals, however, the juri...
On 28 February 2013, the ICTY Appeals Chamber acquitted Momčilo Perišić, former Chief of Staff of t...
Aiding and abetting has been recognised as a form of individual criminal responsibility since the 19...
It is not an overstatement to posit that international criminal law (ICL) has never seen anything qu...
On 28 February 2013, the ICTY Appeals Chamber acquitted Momčilo Perišić, former Chief of Staff of th...
After discussing the notion of ‘fragmentation’ and the value of using the metaphor in the context of...
This note introduces a controversial ICTY decision which attempted to clarify the requisite elements...
This note introduces a controversial ICTY decision which attempted to clarify the requisite elements...
Presently, many of the greatest debates and controversies in international criminal law concern mode...
Presently, many of the greatest debates and controversies in international criminal law concern mode...
Recognising the needs of victims in international criminal justice, the ICC has introduced an innova...
This article addresses the well-known problem of establishing individual criminal responsibility for...
This article considers the suitability of employing particular modes of imputed criminal liability i...
Modes of liability, such as ordering, instigation, superior responsibility and joint criminal liabil...
More than a decade has passed since the establishment of the two ad hoc Tribunals, however, the juri...