Discussion of the “problem of numbers” in morality has focused almost exclusively on the moral significance of numbers in whom-to-rescue cases: when you can save either of two groups of people, but not both, does the number of people in each group matter morally? I suggest that insufficient attention has been paid to the moral significance of numbers in other types of case. According to common-sense morality, numbers make a difference in cases, like the famous Trolley Case, where we must choose whether to kill a person (or persons) as a side effect of saving a greater number. I argue that recognition of the role of numbers in killing cases forces us to reassess purported solutions to the problem of numbers
Abstract Tom Dougherty observes that challenges to counting the numbers often ...
If your self-driving Volvo suddenly must decide whether to swerve into one pedestrian in order to av...
Suppose that each of the following four conditions obtains: 1. You can save either a greater or a le...
To your left, three strangers are drowning. To your right, one other stranger is drowning. You can e...
To your left, three strangers are drowning. To your right, one other stranger is drowning. You can e...
In his paper, “Should the Numbers Count?" John Taurek imagines that we are in a position such that w...
Most people find it irritatingly childish to wonder whether there is anything wrong if a lifeguard w...
The canonical case that psychologists, philosophers, and policy analysts reflect upon in considering...
The ‘standard interpretation’ of John Taurek’s argument in ‘Should the Numbers Count?’ imputes two t...
In the distribution of resources, persons must be respected, or so many philosophers contend. Unfort...
You must either save a group of m people or a group of n people. If there are no morally relevant di...
This article addresses Taruek’s much discussed Number Problem from a non-consequentialist point of v...
This is an argument against the role attribute to numbers in dilemmas that arise from conflicting du...
<p>Note: Blue line, 5 people; Green line, 15 people; The interaction between Problem Situation and S...
Legal cases often require jurors to use numerical information. They may need to evaluate the meaning...
Abstract Tom Dougherty observes that challenges to counting the numbers often ...
If your self-driving Volvo suddenly must decide whether to swerve into one pedestrian in order to av...
Suppose that each of the following four conditions obtains: 1. You can save either a greater or a le...
To your left, three strangers are drowning. To your right, one other stranger is drowning. You can e...
To your left, three strangers are drowning. To your right, one other stranger is drowning. You can e...
In his paper, “Should the Numbers Count?" John Taurek imagines that we are in a position such that w...
Most people find it irritatingly childish to wonder whether there is anything wrong if a lifeguard w...
The canonical case that psychologists, philosophers, and policy analysts reflect upon in considering...
The ‘standard interpretation’ of John Taurek’s argument in ‘Should the Numbers Count?’ imputes two t...
In the distribution of resources, persons must be respected, or so many philosophers contend. Unfort...
You must either save a group of m people or a group of n people. If there are no morally relevant di...
This article addresses Taruek’s much discussed Number Problem from a non-consequentialist point of v...
This is an argument against the role attribute to numbers in dilemmas that arise from conflicting du...
<p>Note: Blue line, 5 people; Green line, 15 people; The interaction between Problem Situation and S...
Legal cases often require jurors to use numerical information. They may need to evaluate the meaning...
Abstract Tom Dougherty observes that challenges to counting the numbers often ...
If your self-driving Volvo suddenly must decide whether to swerve into one pedestrian in order to av...
Suppose that each of the following four conditions obtains: 1. You can save either a greater or a le...