The decision of the state Government of Victoria, Australia, to enable donor-conceived people to learn the identity of their donor regardless of their donor's consent (1) has generated divergent responses: Sonia Allan and Damian Adams welcomed the new legislation as an overdue triumph of the rights of donor-conceived people (in BioNews 841), while Guido Pennings has castigated it as 'disrespectful', 'unfair', 'ungrateful' and 'immoral' (in BioNews 843). Neither of these reactions is surprising, given these scholars' previous contributions to the debate on retrospective removal of donor anonymity (2,3)
The right to know one’s genetic origins should not be recognised as a moral right because it protect...
Purpose Policies and procedures exist in many jurisdictions regarding ‘anonymity’. These prohibit co...
Background Maintaining anonymity is a requirement in the Netherlands and Sweden for kidney donation ...
In the February 2011 report on its inquiry into the past and present practices of donor conception i...
Victoria (Australia) is considering retrospective legislation on the abolition of gamete donor anony...
Two Australian government inquiries have recently called for the release of information to donor-con...
[Extract] On 1 March 2017, the Assisted Reproductive Treatment Amendment Act 2016 (Vic) came into ef...
Two Australian government inquiries have recently called for the release of information to donor-con...
Two Australian government inquiries have recently called for the release of information to donor-con...
It is slightly more than two and a half years since UK law regarding donor anonymity was changed, an...
Donor conception has been practiced as a medical procedure to bypass first, male, and subsequently ...
From 1 April 2005, UK law was changed to allow children born through gamete donation to access ident...
BACKGROUND: In 2005, UK legislation was changed requiring any donor of gametes or embryos used in th...
BACKGROUND: In 2005, UK legislation was changed requiring any donor of gametes or embryos used in th...
BACKGROUND: In 2005, UK legislation was changed requiring any donor of gametes or embryos used in th...
The right to know one’s genetic origins should not be recognised as a moral right because it protect...
Purpose Policies and procedures exist in many jurisdictions regarding ‘anonymity’. These prohibit co...
Background Maintaining anonymity is a requirement in the Netherlands and Sweden for kidney donation ...
In the February 2011 report on its inquiry into the past and present practices of donor conception i...
Victoria (Australia) is considering retrospective legislation on the abolition of gamete donor anony...
Two Australian government inquiries have recently called for the release of information to donor-con...
[Extract] On 1 March 2017, the Assisted Reproductive Treatment Amendment Act 2016 (Vic) came into ef...
Two Australian government inquiries have recently called for the release of information to donor-con...
Two Australian government inquiries have recently called for the release of information to donor-con...
It is slightly more than two and a half years since UK law regarding donor anonymity was changed, an...
Donor conception has been practiced as a medical procedure to bypass first, male, and subsequently ...
From 1 April 2005, UK law was changed to allow children born through gamete donation to access ident...
BACKGROUND: In 2005, UK legislation was changed requiring any donor of gametes or embryos used in th...
BACKGROUND: In 2005, UK legislation was changed requiring any donor of gametes or embryos used in th...
BACKGROUND: In 2005, UK legislation was changed requiring any donor of gametes or embryos used in th...
The right to know one’s genetic origins should not be recognised as a moral right because it protect...
Purpose Policies and procedures exist in many jurisdictions regarding ‘anonymity’. These prohibit co...
Background Maintaining anonymity is a requirement in the Netherlands and Sweden for kidney donation ...