UK defamation law was reformed earlier this year, but what does it mean for the media? An article discussing some of the effects of the reforms to defamation law by the defamation Act 2013. The article considers various aspects of the legislation e.g. the effect of section 1.The article also raises concerns about issues not addressed in the legislation such as what actually amounts to defamation and costs involved in actions
Five years down the line from the Defamation Act 2013 coming into force, its effect on freedom of sp...
Defamation has traditionally been seen as a tort of strict liability, subject to defences. This art...
It is considered axiomatic that defamation law protects reputation. This proposition—commonsensical,...
The Defamation Act 2013 came into force on January 1, 2014. According to the Libel Reform Campaign, ...
The Uniform Law Commissioners are preparing to begin debate on the most sweeping changes to libel la...
April 2013, the Defamation Act was passed, the culmination of a four-year political campaign. The le...
This article will explore several mechanisms for the resolution of defamation cases. It will first r...
Brief article by Julian Harris (Deputy General Editor, Amicus Curiae) on the impact of Lord Lester's...
This paper offers a brief examination of the Defamation Act 2013 to an international audience in ord...
Reforms are currently being considered to Australia's current uniform defamation laws. This article...
tag=1 data=Defamation law reform: the media's ominous agenda. by Geoffrey de Q. Walker. tag=2 data...
The law of defamation is not new to the world, nor limited to certain nations: Moses commanded: Nei...
Unlike the commonplace statement that defamation law protects reputation, this article suggests that...
There is a literal prohibition in the media bar that media lawyers cannot represent plaintiffs in su...
How legal actions for defamation arise, what a complainant has to show to win a libel case, what he/...
Five years down the line from the Defamation Act 2013 coming into force, its effect on freedom of sp...
Defamation has traditionally been seen as a tort of strict liability, subject to defences. This art...
It is considered axiomatic that defamation law protects reputation. This proposition—commonsensical,...
The Defamation Act 2013 came into force on January 1, 2014. According to the Libel Reform Campaign, ...
The Uniform Law Commissioners are preparing to begin debate on the most sweeping changes to libel la...
April 2013, the Defamation Act was passed, the culmination of a four-year political campaign. The le...
This article will explore several mechanisms for the resolution of defamation cases. It will first r...
Brief article by Julian Harris (Deputy General Editor, Amicus Curiae) on the impact of Lord Lester's...
This paper offers a brief examination of the Defamation Act 2013 to an international audience in ord...
Reforms are currently being considered to Australia's current uniform defamation laws. This article...
tag=1 data=Defamation law reform: the media's ominous agenda. by Geoffrey de Q. Walker. tag=2 data...
The law of defamation is not new to the world, nor limited to certain nations: Moses commanded: Nei...
Unlike the commonplace statement that defamation law protects reputation, this article suggests that...
There is a literal prohibition in the media bar that media lawyers cannot represent plaintiffs in su...
How legal actions for defamation arise, what a complainant has to show to win a libel case, what he/...
Five years down the line from the Defamation Act 2013 coming into force, its effect on freedom of sp...
Defamation has traditionally been seen as a tort of strict liability, subject to defences. This art...
It is considered axiomatic that defamation law protects reputation. This proposition—commonsensical,...