A psychological assumption underlying the common and legally sanctioned use of jurors with previous jury experience is that such prior experience has little effect on a juror's behavior. The empirical evidence on this assumption is reviewed. Special attention is devoted to recent research that indicates two types of potential bias among experienced jurors. The theoretical and practical implications of this research are discussed
Juries are distinct groups in which scholars have been investigating for decades past. Members of th...
Prior research by Kaplan and Miller (1978) suggested that juries are generally influenced less by ex...
Pretrial publicity (PTP) can bias jurors’ decisions. The courts often assume such bias can be amelio...
The majority of research examining factors that influence jurors where the sole evidence is eyewitne...
We explored the effects of pretrial publicity (PTP) and juror age on decision making and source memo...
This paper explores how the hindsight bias and anchoring effect influence jurors’ judgments. The res...
Previous research has examined the validity of behavioral assumptions underlying the presumed effect...
We examined whether jurors who know that a prosecutor has a high conviction rate are more inclined t...
We examined whether jurors who know that a prosecutor has a high conviction rate are more inclined t...
Little empirical evidence exists to suggest that jurors may develop negative perceptions of the cour...
This experiment explored how mock-jurors’ (N = 648) guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, m...
Juries in adversarial courts are tasked with several responsibilities. They are asked to: 1) assess ...
This 2-part study explored how exposure to negative pretrial publicity (Neg-PTP) influences the jury...
Purpose. The objective of this review was to give a broad overview of various biases associated with...
The current study examined the influence of eyewitness familiarity with the defendant (familiar vs. ...
Juries are distinct groups in which scholars have been investigating for decades past. Members of th...
Prior research by Kaplan and Miller (1978) suggested that juries are generally influenced less by ex...
Pretrial publicity (PTP) can bias jurors’ decisions. The courts often assume such bias can be amelio...
The majority of research examining factors that influence jurors where the sole evidence is eyewitne...
We explored the effects of pretrial publicity (PTP) and juror age on decision making and source memo...
This paper explores how the hindsight bias and anchoring effect influence jurors’ judgments. The res...
Previous research has examined the validity of behavioral assumptions underlying the presumed effect...
We examined whether jurors who know that a prosecutor has a high conviction rate are more inclined t...
We examined whether jurors who know that a prosecutor has a high conviction rate are more inclined t...
Little empirical evidence exists to suggest that jurors may develop negative perceptions of the cour...
This experiment explored how mock-jurors’ (N = 648) guilt decisions, perceptions of the defendant, m...
Juries in adversarial courts are tasked with several responsibilities. They are asked to: 1) assess ...
This 2-part study explored how exposure to negative pretrial publicity (Neg-PTP) influences the jury...
Purpose. The objective of this review was to give a broad overview of various biases associated with...
The current study examined the influence of eyewitness familiarity with the defendant (familiar vs. ...
Juries are distinct groups in which scholars have been investigating for decades past. Members of th...
Prior research by Kaplan and Miller (1978) suggested that juries are generally influenced less by ex...
Pretrial publicity (PTP) can bias jurors’ decisions. The courts often assume such bias can be amelio...