In a paper prepared for the Democratic Audit of Australia, Graeme Orr of Griffith University\u27s Law School argues that one significant group of Australian citizens is in large part excluded from voting. They are persons under sentence of imprisonment. The paper questions the various grounds advanced for this exclusion. It also notes the recent decision by the Supreme Court of Canada to overturn prisoner disenfranchisement but concludes that prospects for reform in Australia are limited
Sandey Fitzgerald provides new evidence on when and how prisoners have been able to vote in the vari...
This book chapter examines a successful prisoner voting rights case in Canada and suggests that the ...
The Australian Parliament recently tightened section 93 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act to provide...
Drawing on and combining political science and legal frameworks, this article explores the validity ...
To remove the right of prisoners to vote does many things. … It signals that whatever the prisoner s...
In restricting the voting rights of prisoners, the Senate has undermined a fundamental democractic p...
This article explores and critiques the rationales for disenfranchising prisoners advanced by politi...
In the wake of the High Court’s decision on prisoner enfranchisement, Graeme Orr describes the issue...
In 2006, Australia’s Parliament banned all prisoners from voting. A year later, Vickie Lee Roach, a ...
David Brown takes a road trip to Canberra for the Roach fixture at the High Court where modernity is...
Experience from the US suggests that prisoners should keep the right to vote, writes Marc Mauer. AS ...
Following the decision of the ECtHR in Hirst v UK, (Application no. 74025/01) the government indicat...
This paper considers the justifiability of removing the right to vote from those convicted of crimes...
Should prisoners have the right to vote? This Current Issues Brief considers the arguments commonly ...
This paper takes seriously the objection that allowing prisoners to vote may have an impact on the o...
Sandey Fitzgerald provides new evidence on when and how prisoners have been able to vote in the vari...
This book chapter examines a successful prisoner voting rights case in Canada and suggests that the ...
The Australian Parliament recently tightened section 93 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act to provide...
Drawing on and combining political science and legal frameworks, this article explores the validity ...
To remove the right of prisoners to vote does many things. … It signals that whatever the prisoner s...
In restricting the voting rights of prisoners, the Senate has undermined a fundamental democractic p...
This article explores and critiques the rationales for disenfranchising prisoners advanced by politi...
In the wake of the High Court’s decision on prisoner enfranchisement, Graeme Orr describes the issue...
In 2006, Australia’s Parliament banned all prisoners from voting. A year later, Vickie Lee Roach, a ...
David Brown takes a road trip to Canberra for the Roach fixture at the High Court where modernity is...
Experience from the US suggests that prisoners should keep the right to vote, writes Marc Mauer. AS ...
Following the decision of the ECtHR in Hirst v UK, (Application no. 74025/01) the government indicat...
This paper considers the justifiability of removing the right to vote from those convicted of crimes...
Should prisoners have the right to vote? This Current Issues Brief considers the arguments commonly ...
This paper takes seriously the objection that allowing prisoners to vote may have an impact on the o...
Sandey Fitzgerald provides new evidence on when and how prisoners have been able to vote in the vari...
This book chapter examines a successful prisoner voting rights case in Canada and suggests that the ...
The Australian Parliament recently tightened section 93 of the Commonwealth Electoral Act to provide...