Social capital and welfare: dependency or division? Examining bridging trends by welfare regime, 1981 to 2000

Social capital is a contentious and multifaceted topic. A broad consensus has been reached, however, that norms such as trust, networks of association membership, and practices of volunteering and socialising are essential to its makeup. It is also increasingly recognised that such elements fall into two distinct types of social capital - bonding and bridging. Social structural influences, such as welfare, have an effect on social capital. A common conservative conception is that welfare induces dependency and thereby erodes social capital; this can be called the \u27dependency hypothesis\u27. Roger Patulny suggests this is largely limited to bonding capital only, however. He suggests an alternative, that welfare cutbacks or contingencies upon mutual obligation or status preservation is socially divisive. He calls this the \u27division hypothesis\u27, and it is relevant to the more definitively positive bridging capital. This paper shows trends in bridging social capital in nine OECD countries of differing welfare regime type from 1981 to 2000. It uses data from the most recent versions of the World Values Survey and Multinational Time Use Study. It suggests that welfare regime type, and importantly, welfare regime re-structuring, bears strong relations to national levels of bridging social capital