Add to ORKGin this submission to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on ASIO, ASIS and DSD\u27s inquiry into ASIO\u27s questioning and detention powers, George Williams and Ben Saul provide a framework for evaluating anti-terrorism laws based on international law and traditional common law principles. They consider whether the legislation is still needed to confront the terrorist threat to Australia, and assess provisions of the relevant legislation
The Australian legal definition of terrorism and a brief history of terrorism in Australia set the c...
This paper assesses the legislative changes contained in the Australian Security Intelligence Organi...
The Coalition’s new security legislation shows that it hasn’t learnt the lessons of twelve years of ...
Introduction This report is to review the operation, effectiveness, and implications, of the releva...
This submission concentrates upon the following terms of reference for the inquiry: * The develop...
In this paper for the 2007 Australasian Political Science Association conference, Daniel Baldino arg...
ASIO doesn’t need all the emergency powers it was given two years ago, write George Williams a...
This report reviews the appropriateness and effectiveness of Australia\u27s national security legis...
After questioning, a person’s detention should be decided by the courts, not government, write...
The extensively amended Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Legislation Amendment (Terrori...
This article seeks to place the debate generated by the counter-terrorism legislation enacted in Aus...
This chapter addresses Australian legislative and juridical responses to acts officially defined as ...
The product of a remarkable series of compromises, ASIO’s new powers should only operate for t...
During 2002, on the pretext of shielding the Australian people from terrorism, the Howard government...
This paper considers the implications for the community legal sector of the Australian Government’s ...
The Australian legal definition of terrorism and a brief history of terrorism in Australia set the c...
This paper assesses the legislative changes contained in the Australian Security Intelligence Organi...
The Coalition’s new security legislation shows that it hasn’t learnt the lessons of twelve years of ...
Introduction This report is to review the operation, effectiveness, and implications, of the releva...
This submission concentrates upon the following terms of reference for the inquiry: * The develop...
In this paper for the 2007 Australasian Political Science Association conference, Daniel Baldino arg...
ASIO doesn’t need all the emergency powers it was given two years ago, write George Williams a...
This report reviews the appropriateness and effectiveness of Australia\u27s national security legis...
After questioning, a person’s detention should be decided by the courts, not government, write...
The extensively amended Australian Security Intelligence Organisation Legislation Amendment (Terrori...
This article seeks to place the debate generated by the counter-terrorism legislation enacted in Aus...
This chapter addresses Australian legislative and juridical responses to acts officially defined as ...
The product of a remarkable series of compromises, ASIO’s new powers should only operate for t...
During 2002, on the pretext of shielding the Australian people from terrorism, the Howard government...
This paper considers the implications for the community legal sector of the Australian Government’s ...
The Australian legal definition of terrorism and a brief history of terrorism in Australia set the c...
This paper assesses the legislative changes contained in the Australian Security Intelligence Organi...
The Coalition’s new security legislation shows that it hasn’t learnt the lessons of twelve years of ...