For economists, the main test of a microeconomic policy change is its effect on efficiency: gains minus losses, equally weighted. However, it is standard economics that individuals value losses more than gains. Moreover, imposing large, uncompensated and uninsurable policy-induced losses would be widely regarded as unfair, when they are merely collateral damage from policy action. The article argues the case for adjusting the calculation of efficiency to take account of this \u27unfairness\u27 and discusses how it could be done. The context is the relatively recent acceptance in Australia of competition, if planned and regulated, as being generally socially beneficial
This paper argues that Australia\u27s dynamic and socially mobile society neither safeguards the p...
To address the economic problems facing Australia in 1986 required wage restraint, which required in...
Economists have often treated the objective of health services as being the maximization of the QALY...
Large estimates of the benefits of microeconomic reform have been put forward in official studies. B...
Large estimates of the benefits of microeconomic reform have been put forward in official studies. B...
This is a revised version of a paper that was presented as the Inaugural Department of Economics – M...
Australians are now reaping the economic fruits of two decades of reform and structural change. But ...
In December 2013 the recently elected Australian Government commissioned a review into Australia...
“Neoliberalism”, both as a body of theory and as a set of policies and practices, is commonly seen a...
In this article we present new estimates of the degree of welfare loss resulting from monopoly eleme...
This article provides resolutions to a number of conundrums that have vexed policy-makers and schola...
Australia is undoubtably a nation rich with opportunities, with extensive social and economic infras...
Australian social policy has seen apparently contradictory developments over the period of economic ...
This paper presents an analysis of the Five Economists’ plan for a “wage-tax trade-off”, combining a...
Labour market ‘deregulation ’ is a major economic policy issue in Australia. Some of the desire for ...
This paper argues that Australia\u27s dynamic and socially mobile society neither safeguards the p...
To address the economic problems facing Australia in 1986 required wage restraint, which required in...
Economists have often treated the objective of health services as being the maximization of the QALY...
Large estimates of the benefits of microeconomic reform have been put forward in official studies. B...
Large estimates of the benefits of microeconomic reform have been put forward in official studies. B...
This is a revised version of a paper that was presented as the Inaugural Department of Economics – M...
Australians are now reaping the economic fruits of two decades of reform and structural change. But ...
In December 2013 the recently elected Australian Government commissioned a review into Australia...
“Neoliberalism”, both as a body of theory and as a set of policies and practices, is commonly seen a...
In this article we present new estimates of the degree of welfare loss resulting from monopoly eleme...
This article provides resolutions to a number of conundrums that have vexed policy-makers and schola...
Australia is undoubtably a nation rich with opportunities, with extensive social and economic infras...
Australian social policy has seen apparently contradictory developments over the period of economic ...
This paper presents an analysis of the Five Economists’ plan for a “wage-tax trade-off”, combining a...
Labour market ‘deregulation ’ is a major economic policy issue in Australia. Some of the desire for ...
This paper argues that Australia\u27s dynamic and socially mobile society neither safeguards the p...
To address the economic problems facing Australia in 1986 required wage restraint, which required in...
Economists have often treated the objective of health services as being the maximization of the QALY...