The value of Victoria\u27s charter of rights was on display in the Court of Appeal, writes Edward Santow in The Age THIS WEEK, the Victorian Court of Appeal gave one of its most important decisions, in a landmark case that considered the right to a fair trial and the Victorian Charter of Rights. The case shows that the charter operates more subtly than some have suggested, and the result will certainly frustrate both charter advocates and opponents. But, in my view, the court made the right decision and it will be good for our democracy. The case was about Victoria\u27s unusual drugs law, and it started with a drugs bust at the home Vera Momcilovic shared with her partner. Imagine it were you. A fateful knock on your door; the police enter ...
Part I of this paper documents the unscrupulous politics of the majority Harper Government in enacti...
When it came to matters of criminal process, the Charter was not greeted with enthusiasm. There was ...
Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General) was the first case in which a claimant sought damages u...
A charge of drug trafficking becomes the first test of the Victorian Charter of Human Rights in the ...
This paper suggests that several recent decisions of the Supreme Court show undue vagueness, inconsi...
There is a link between a presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial. The rights of a le...
This paper asks whether the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, as interpreted over the past 25...
The distinction between criminal and administrative wrongdoing plays a key role in Canadian public l...
Canada\u27s leading jurists, including Madam Justice Louise Arbour and Mr. Justice David Doherty of ...
The principle of the presumption of innocence is already an important principle in modern democracie...
Michael McHugh has shifted the terms of the rights debate, writes Andrew Lynch IN THE WAY that only...
In the aftermath of the High Court’s decision in Pell v The Queen to quash the guilty verdicts and e...
In July 2009 the Supreme Court of Canada released R. v. Grant, R. v. Suberu, R. v. Harrison and R. v...
The first decades of the Supreme Court of Canada\u27s Charter jurisprudence have coincided roughly w...
The unmet demand for legal aid generally and for criminal law matters in particular, has grown in ta...
Part I of this paper documents the unscrupulous politics of the majority Harper Government in enacti...
When it came to matters of criminal process, the Charter was not greeted with enthusiasm. There was ...
Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General) was the first case in which a claimant sought damages u...
A charge of drug trafficking becomes the first test of the Victorian Charter of Human Rights in the ...
This paper suggests that several recent decisions of the Supreme Court show undue vagueness, inconsi...
There is a link between a presumption of innocence and the right to a fair trial. The rights of a le...
This paper asks whether the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms, as interpreted over the past 25...
The distinction between criminal and administrative wrongdoing plays a key role in Canadian public l...
Canada\u27s leading jurists, including Madam Justice Louise Arbour and Mr. Justice David Doherty of ...
The principle of the presumption of innocence is already an important principle in modern democracie...
Michael McHugh has shifted the terms of the rights debate, writes Andrew Lynch IN THE WAY that only...
In the aftermath of the High Court’s decision in Pell v The Queen to quash the guilty verdicts and e...
In July 2009 the Supreme Court of Canada released R. v. Grant, R. v. Suberu, R. v. Harrison and R. v...
The first decades of the Supreme Court of Canada\u27s Charter jurisprudence have coincided roughly w...
The unmet demand for legal aid generally and for criminal law matters in particular, has grown in ta...
Part I of this paper documents the unscrupulous politics of the majority Harper Government in enacti...
When it came to matters of criminal process, the Charter was not greeted with enthusiasm. There was ...
Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General) was the first case in which a claimant sought damages u...