Provides a summary of the High Court decision on builders\u27 liability and the stakeholder reaction to it. It also explores the possible relationship between the decision and the amendments to the Home Building Act 1989 which are about to come into force. Introduction On Wednesday 8 October 2014, in Brookfield Multiplex Ltd v Owners Corporation Strata Plan 612881 (Brookfield) the High Court held that a builder of a strata-titled serviced apartment building did not owe a duty of care to the Owners Corporation to take reasonable care to avoid purely economic loss arising from latent defects in the building’s construction. The builder was therefore not liable in negligence to the Owners Corporation. This e-brief provides a summary of the H...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.For centuries, the law of landlord premises lia...
The Court of Appeals of California has held that the doctrine of strict liability applies to home bu...
This paper addresses the legal liability of valuers to mortgage lenders for professional negligence,...
A perennially litigious area of the law of negligence is that dealing with builders' liability. The ...
The High Court, in the 1995 landmark case of Bryan v Maloney, held a builder of a residential house ...
This thesis considers the issue of when a tortious duty of care to prevent economic loss should be i...
This article examines the law relating to the liability of landlords in negligence for unsafe reside...
The plaintiff, an infant, fell from the back porch of an apartment leased by his parents from a hous...
This paper discusses the Supreme Court decision in McNamara v Auckland City Council. As McNamara is ...
The Court considered whether statutory limitation periods for constructional defects may be contract...
The author examines the New Zealand Court of Appeal’s reasoning in Holler v Osaki [2016] NZCA 130. T...
According to the latest available statistics, in 1997-98, of the total of seven million Australian h...
Assesses Persimmon Homes Ltd v Ove Arup and Partners Ltd and the courts’ approach to exclusion claus...
Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc., held that a tract home-builder must defend his actions against the ...
Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to demystify the meaning of the term “consequential loss” in r...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.For centuries, the law of landlord premises lia...
The Court of Appeals of California has held that the doctrine of strict liability applies to home bu...
This paper addresses the legal liability of valuers to mortgage lenders for professional negligence,...
A perennially litigious area of the law of negligence is that dealing with builders' liability. The ...
The High Court, in the 1995 landmark case of Bryan v Maloney, held a builder of a residential house ...
This thesis considers the issue of when a tortious duty of care to prevent economic loss should be i...
This article examines the law relating to the liability of landlords in negligence for unsafe reside...
The plaintiff, an infant, fell from the back porch of an apartment leased by his parents from a hous...
This paper discusses the Supreme Court decision in McNamara v Auckland City Council. As McNamara is ...
The Court considered whether statutory limitation periods for constructional defects may be contract...
The author examines the New Zealand Court of Appeal’s reasoning in Holler v Osaki [2016] NZCA 130. T...
According to the latest available statistics, in 1997-98, of the total of seven million Australian h...
Assesses Persimmon Homes Ltd v Ove Arup and Partners Ltd and the courts’ approach to exclusion claus...
Schipper v. Levitt & Sons, Inc., held that a tract home-builder must defend his actions against the ...
Purpose -The purpose of this paper is to demystify the meaning of the term “consequential loss” in r...
Full-text available at SSRN. See link in this record.For centuries, the law of landlord premises lia...
The Court of Appeals of California has held that the doctrine of strict liability applies to home bu...
This paper addresses the legal liability of valuers to mortgage lenders for professional negligence,...