Purpose: This paper reflects on some aspects of method in management history and the importance of the self-reflection on their world-view that must accompany authors’ endeavours, in order to be articulated in the matters they proffer for the reader’s judgement. Approach: Drawing on the insights proffered by Evans (1999:1) about how to study, research, write about and read history, this paper offers some thoughts on the importance of giving due consideration to method in management history. Research & Practical Implications: Thomas Hobbes (1660/1994:32) observed that “Out of our conception of the past, we make a future”. It behoves us then, as managers and management scholars, to be satisfied that our conceptions of the past are developed i...
Though the field of M&A has come under increasing criticism for its lack of providing theories and e...
A New History of Management (ANHM) sets a renewed and higher standard for teaching the history of ou...
We agree with de Jong et al.'s argument that business historians should make their methods more expl...
This paper reflects on some aspects of method in management history and the importance of the self-r...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to consider the value of management history as a contributor ...
Purpose: To promote a multidisciplinary/interdisciplinary approach to the themes of management and b...
Purpose: This paper reflects on some aspects of pedagogy in management history, using Boyer’s (1990)...
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the contributions of the so-called “Historic Turn”...
Purpose: This paper introduces the Journal of Management History, relaunched as a stand-alone journa...
This essay addresses the apparent exclusion of historical methods from management research methods t...
Historical research in organization and management studies continues to be described as a type of in...
There has, in recent times, been an increasing interest in history, broadly defined, among managemen...
In this reflective essay, written for the 50th anniversary of Management Learning, we look at the hi...
This paper builds a case for using the qualitative methodology of critical biography to illuminate t...
Historical research in accounting and management, hitherto largely neglected as a field of inquiry b...
Though the field of M&A has come under increasing criticism for its lack of providing theories and e...
A New History of Management (ANHM) sets a renewed and higher standard for teaching the history of ou...
We agree with de Jong et al.'s argument that business historians should make their methods more expl...
This paper reflects on some aspects of method in management history and the importance of the self-r...
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to consider the value of management history as a contributor ...
Purpose: To promote a multidisciplinary/interdisciplinary approach to the themes of management and b...
Purpose: This paper reflects on some aspects of pedagogy in management history, using Boyer’s (1990)...
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the contributions of the so-called “Historic Turn”...
Purpose: This paper introduces the Journal of Management History, relaunched as a stand-alone journa...
This essay addresses the apparent exclusion of historical methods from management research methods t...
Historical research in organization and management studies continues to be described as a type of in...
There has, in recent times, been an increasing interest in history, broadly defined, among managemen...
In this reflective essay, written for the 50th anniversary of Management Learning, we look at the hi...
This paper builds a case for using the qualitative methodology of critical biography to illuminate t...
Historical research in accounting and management, hitherto largely neglected as a field of inquiry b...
Though the field of M&A has come under increasing criticism for its lack of providing theories and e...
A New History of Management (ANHM) sets a renewed and higher standard for teaching the history of ou...
We agree with de Jong et al.'s argument that business historians should make their methods more expl...