In 1992 the Georgia State Legislature passed the Georgia State Tort Claims Act ( GTCA ) which waived the state\u27s sovereign immunity. The GTCA defines state as the State of Georgia and any of its offices, agencies, authorities, departments, commissions, boards, divisions, instrumentalities, and institutions but the statute specifically excludes counties, municipalities, school districts, other units of local government, hospital authorities, or housing and other local authorities. Under the GTCA a discretionary function or duty is specifically defined by statue. However, the common law distinction between ministerial and discretionary functions still applies to all entities exempted from the GTCA
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court refuses to abolish the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Dillon v. York...
The Act grants immunity, under certain circumstances, to both the State of Georgia and to county and...
The governmental-proprietary distinction has led a stormy life. Courts have characterized it as “ill...
Until recently, sovereign immunity—the doctrine that protects state entities from suit without the S...
The Act provides for a limited abrogation of state sovereign immunity in Georgia. It applies to act...
The doctrine of the immunity of the sovereign in tort has long been the subject of attack by statesm...
The initial question in evaluating the ability of a municipal corporation to control the affairs of ...
The State\u27s immunity from liability for the torts of its officers and employees claims legendary ...
The common law rule of governmental immunity made governments immune from suit and held public offic...
The Resolution proposed an amendment to the Georgia Constitution which would have clarified the waiv...
Another banner year for local governments. A gubernatorial veto preserves, for now, the Georgia Supr...
The common law established the doctrine of sovereign immunity whereby the government is not civilly ...
In 1996 the Federal Tort Claims Act turns fifty. Few statutes reach the half-century mark only sligh...
This Note analyzes the Coleman case. The Note suggests that the court incorrectly applied the public...
The Act declares the public policy of the State to be that municipal corporations are immune from li...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court refuses to abolish the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Dillon v. York...
The Act grants immunity, under certain circumstances, to both the State of Georgia and to county and...
The governmental-proprietary distinction has led a stormy life. Courts have characterized it as “ill...
Until recently, sovereign immunity—the doctrine that protects state entities from suit without the S...
The Act provides for a limited abrogation of state sovereign immunity in Georgia. It applies to act...
The doctrine of the immunity of the sovereign in tort has long been the subject of attack by statesm...
The initial question in evaluating the ability of a municipal corporation to control the affairs of ...
The State\u27s immunity from liability for the torts of its officers and employees claims legendary ...
The common law rule of governmental immunity made governments immune from suit and held public offic...
The Resolution proposed an amendment to the Georgia Constitution which would have clarified the waiv...
Another banner year for local governments. A gubernatorial veto preserves, for now, the Georgia Supr...
The common law established the doctrine of sovereign immunity whereby the government is not civilly ...
In 1996 the Federal Tort Claims Act turns fifty. Few statutes reach the half-century mark only sligh...
This Note analyzes the Coleman case. The Note suggests that the court incorrectly applied the public...
The Act declares the public policy of the State to be that municipal corporations are immune from li...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court refuses to abolish the doctrine of sovereign immunity. Dillon v. York...
The Act grants immunity, under certain circumstances, to both the State of Georgia and to county and...
The governmental-proprietary distinction has led a stormy life. Courts have characterized it as “ill...