The purpose of this Article is to analyze the admissibility of expert testimony on credibility. State v. Woodburn serves as a lens to focus on the broader issues. The primary issue is an examination of expert testimony on credibility in light of the Federal Rules of Evidence and their progeny. The Rules of Evidence mandate admission or exclusion of expert testimony based on certain criteria. How are these criteria applied to expert testimony on credibility? How should they be applied? The surprising survivability of other criteria discarded by the Rules is also considered
Abstract. While courts depend on expert opinions in reaching sound judgments, the role of the expert...
Medical evidence of a witness\u27 capacity to testify has long been admitted at trial. However, evid...
Expert testimony is offered at the vast majority of trials in courts of general jurisdiction in the ...
The purpose of this Article is to analyze the admissibility of expert testimony on credibility. Stat...
This article explores the ways in which experts can assist the jury to assess the credibility of oth...
Part II of this paper briefly describes the federal rule in order to appreciate the context of the N...
Article VI of the Michigan Rules of Evidence contains the rules dealing with witnesses. Trials bring...
Federal Rule of Evidence 702 speaks in very general terms. It governs every situation in which scie...
Modern law on expert testimony insists, as a condition of admissibility, that the asserted expertise...
Part I of this Article delineates a defendant\u27s right to present voluntariness and credibility ev...
The article first summarizes the possible sources of error found in eyewitness testimony according t...
Two characteristic principles of Anglo-American evidence law are the requirement that witnesses test...
Appraising the worth of others’ testimony is always complex; appraising the worth of expert testimon...
A trial court must find that the proponent of expert witness testimony has set forth adequate eviden...
The article discussess two problems of great importance for a judicial practice: 1) conception of r...
Abstract. While courts depend on expert opinions in reaching sound judgments, the role of the expert...
Medical evidence of a witness\u27 capacity to testify has long been admitted at trial. However, evid...
Expert testimony is offered at the vast majority of trials in courts of general jurisdiction in the ...
The purpose of this Article is to analyze the admissibility of expert testimony on credibility. Stat...
This article explores the ways in which experts can assist the jury to assess the credibility of oth...
Part II of this paper briefly describes the federal rule in order to appreciate the context of the N...
Article VI of the Michigan Rules of Evidence contains the rules dealing with witnesses. Trials bring...
Federal Rule of Evidence 702 speaks in very general terms. It governs every situation in which scie...
Modern law on expert testimony insists, as a condition of admissibility, that the asserted expertise...
Part I of this Article delineates a defendant\u27s right to present voluntariness and credibility ev...
The article first summarizes the possible sources of error found in eyewitness testimony according t...
Two characteristic principles of Anglo-American evidence law are the requirement that witnesses test...
Appraising the worth of others’ testimony is always complex; appraising the worth of expert testimon...
A trial court must find that the proponent of expert witness testimony has set forth adequate eviden...
The article discussess two problems of great importance for a judicial practice: 1) conception of r...
Abstract. While courts depend on expert opinions in reaching sound judgments, the role of the expert...
Medical evidence of a witness\u27 capacity to testify has long been admitted at trial. However, evid...
Expert testimony is offered at the vast majority of trials in courts of general jurisdiction in the ...