We argue that uncomputability and classical scepticism are both reflections of inductive underdetermination, so that Church's thesis and Hume's problem ought to receive equal emphasis in a balanced approach to the philosophy of induction. As an illustration of such an approach, we investigate how uncomputable the predictions of a hypothesis can be if the hypothesis is to be reliably investigated by a computable scientific method
AbstractCopeland and others have argued that the Church–Turing thesis (CTT) has been widely misunder...
This paper presents a new account of Hume’s “probability of causes”. There are two main results atta...
Part 3.1. Briefly introduces the problem of induction: that is, the problem that it is difficult to ...
ABSTRACT. We argue that uncomputability and classical scepticism are both re ections of inductive un...
AbstractI argue that uncomputable formal problems are intuitively, mathematically, and methodologica...
The problem of induction is most famously discussed by David Hume, though he himself has never resor...
Includes bibliographical references.David Hume was the first philosopher to discuss the problem of i...
abstract: There is no doubt that inductive logic and inductive arguments are vital to the formation ...
On the basis of the distinction between logical and factual probability, epistemic justification is ...
This article considers two arguments that purport to show that inductive reasoning is unjustified: t...
In a recent Philosophy of Science article Gerhard Schurz proposes meta-inductivistic prediction stra...
The aim of this contribution is to provide a rather general answer to Hume's problem, the well-known...
This paper aims to advance two claims. First, it aims to show that Hume's argument against the ratio...
Hume's 'problem of induction' has made justifying and validating inferences from\ud empirical observ...
I raise the following five objections to Hume???s problem of induction. (i) Experience and reason jo...
AbstractCopeland and others have argued that the Church–Turing thesis (CTT) has been widely misunder...
This paper presents a new account of Hume’s “probability of causes”. There are two main results atta...
Part 3.1. Briefly introduces the problem of induction: that is, the problem that it is difficult to ...
ABSTRACT. We argue that uncomputability and classical scepticism are both re ections of inductive un...
AbstractI argue that uncomputable formal problems are intuitively, mathematically, and methodologica...
The problem of induction is most famously discussed by David Hume, though he himself has never resor...
Includes bibliographical references.David Hume was the first philosopher to discuss the problem of i...
abstract: There is no doubt that inductive logic and inductive arguments are vital to the formation ...
On the basis of the distinction between logical and factual probability, epistemic justification is ...
This article considers two arguments that purport to show that inductive reasoning is unjustified: t...
In a recent Philosophy of Science article Gerhard Schurz proposes meta-inductivistic prediction stra...
The aim of this contribution is to provide a rather general answer to Hume's problem, the well-known...
This paper aims to advance two claims. First, it aims to show that Hume's argument against the ratio...
Hume's 'problem of induction' has made justifying and validating inferences from\ud empirical observ...
I raise the following five objections to Hume???s problem of induction. (i) Experience and reason jo...
AbstractCopeland and others have argued that the Church–Turing thesis (CTT) has been widely misunder...
This paper presents a new account of Hume’s “probability of causes”. There are two main results atta...
Part 3.1. Briefly introduces the problem of induction: that is, the problem that it is difficult to ...