Despite holding the potential to liberate scholarly information, the digital era has, to the contrary, increased the control of a few for-profit publishers. While most journals in the print era were owned by academic institutions and scientific societies, the majority of scientific papers are currently published by five for-profit publishers, which often exhibit profit margins between 30%-40%. This paper documents the evolution of this consolidation over the last 40 years, discusses the peculiar economics of scholarly publishing, and reflects upon the role of publishers in today’s academe
Unpublished manuscriptThe paper proposes six reasons why the cost of scholarly communication will fa...
This briefing paper aims to provide a historical perspective that can inform the debates about what ...
This briefing paper aims to provide a historical perspective that can inform the debates about what ...
Despite holding the potential to liberate scholarly information, the digital era has, to the contrar...
Despite holding the potential to liberate scholarly information, the digital era has, to the contrar...
Despite holding the potential to liberate scholarly information, the digital era has, to the contrar...
The consolidation of the scientific publishing industry has been the topic of much debate within and...
The consolidation of the scientific publishing industry has been the topic of much debate within an...
Commercial scholarly publishers promote and sell bundles of journals— known as big deals—that provi...
Commercial scholarly publishers promote and sell bundles of journals— known as big deals—that provi...
<p><strong>Description</strong></p> <p><em>Data and figures for paper published in PLOS ONE:</em><br...
Almost 75% of the current academic journals have gone online, even as they continue to publish in pr...
Commercial scholarly publishers promote and sell bundles of journals—known as big deals—that provide...
The scholarly communication and research evaluation landscape is locked into historical paradigms wh...
This briefing paper aims to provide a historical perspective that can inform the debates about what ...
Unpublished manuscriptThe paper proposes six reasons why the cost of scholarly communication will fa...
This briefing paper aims to provide a historical perspective that can inform the debates about what ...
This briefing paper aims to provide a historical perspective that can inform the debates about what ...
Despite holding the potential to liberate scholarly information, the digital era has, to the contrar...
Despite holding the potential to liberate scholarly information, the digital era has, to the contrar...
Despite holding the potential to liberate scholarly information, the digital era has, to the contrar...
The consolidation of the scientific publishing industry has been the topic of much debate within and...
The consolidation of the scientific publishing industry has been the topic of much debate within an...
Commercial scholarly publishers promote and sell bundles of journals— known as big deals—that provi...
Commercial scholarly publishers promote and sell bundles of journals— known as big deals—that provi...
<p><strong>Description</strong></p> <p><em>Data and figures for paper published in PLOS ONE:</em><br...
Almost 75% of the current academic journals have gone online, even as they continue to publish in pr...
Commercial scholarly publishers promote and sell bundles of journals—known as big deals—that provide...
The scholarly communication and research evaluation landscape is locked into historical paradigms wh...
This briefing paper aims to provide a historical perspective that can inform the debates about what ...
Unpublished manuscriptThe paper proposes six reasons why the cost of scholarly communication will fa...
This briefing paper aims to provide a historical perspective that can inform the debates about what ...
This briefing paper aims to provide a historical perspective that can inform the debates about what ...