A volume-pressure tail cuff method for hemodynamic parameters: comparison of restraint and light isoflurane anesthesia in normotensive male Lewis rats

Introduction: A volume-pressure sensor and tail-cuff method for monitoring blood pressure is non-invasive and inexpensive. This method requires animals to be restrained or subjected to anesthesia, but comparative effects of these manipulations on hemodynamic parameters have not been documented. Methods: Using a volume-pressure sensor and tail-cuff, we serially measured blood pressure and heart rate in normotensive adult male Lewis rats after light isoflurane-induced anesthesia (5% induction, 1% maintenance) and, following untrained restraint. Blood pressure was recorded until the acquisition of three complete measurements without the range of replicate mean arterial pressures exceeding 15 mmHg (steady-state). Results: Averages for the entire series of consecutive measurements indicated that restraint yielded significantly higher systolic and diastolic blood pressure than anesthesia (P < .05), but heart rate was not affected. Following stabilization at steady-state, there were no significant differences in intra- or inter-day hemodynamic values between the restraint and isoflurane groups. The inter-day coefficient of variation for systolic pressure was 13–23% for isoflurane and 9–14% for restraint. Bland-Altman analysis showed wide limits of agreement (±59 mmHg systolic; ±49 mmHg diastolic pressure) between restraint and isoflurane measurements. Discussion: Isoflurane caused more variability but there was agreement in BP evaluation by the isoflurane and restraint methods. Using the VPR system, light isoflurane-induced anesthesia and restraint could effectively be used to screen and quantify overt changes in hemodynamic parameters for cardiovascular research utilizing laboratory rodents