Relationship between employment category and gender on quality of life, physical activity and their barriers and motivators, for full-time university staff

Purpose – There has been considerable interest in worksite health programmes to improve employee health and productivity with programme effectiveness possibly influenced by employment category and gender. The purpose of this paper is to examine the current quality of life (QOL), physical activity (PA) levels, sitting times, and barriers/motivators to undertaking PA between academic and professional, and male and female staff within a university workplace. Design/methodology/approach – Participants (105 males, 192 females, n=297) employed as full-time staff of a regional university completed an online survey with differences between staff categories (academic vs professional) and genders identified via ANCOVA using sitting time and working hours as covariates. Relationships between variables were assessed using Spearman's Rank correlations. Findings – Academic and male staff reported greater working hours (~7-25 per cent, p<0.05) but similar QOL, seven-day total PA (~3,600 MET-minutes per week) and sitting times (~6-7 hours per day) compared to professional and female staff. The most common barriers for PA were lack of time or energy, with motivators including to feel good or improve health. Male staff reported these less frequently compared to females (~13-25 per cent, p<0.05). Significant correlations between working hours and QOL (=-0.157 to -0.220, p<0.05), sitting time and QOL (=-0.195 to 0.171, p<0.05), and PA levels and QOL (=0.141-0.192, p