The internal structure of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test Version 2.0 (MSCEIT) has stimulated debate lasting nearly a decade. In an attempt to synthesize accumulating yet contradictory research findings regarding its factor structure, meta-analytic structural equation modeling was employed. Nineteen correlation matrices of eight variables (N = 10,573) were included in the meta-analysis. Results of a homogeneity analysis indicated that the 19 matrices were homogenous. Although the four-factor model of ability EI had excellent fits on four different indices, it was not preferred due to a high correlation (r = .90, p < .01) between branches one and two. On this basis, a three-factor solution was proposed as best-fitting al...
Since Salovey and Mayer's (1990) seminal article on emotional intelligence(EI), the construct has re...
We address concerns raised by Maul (2012) regarding the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotion...
Replies to comments made by G. E. Gignac on the current authors\u27 original article . Gignac reanal...
The internal structure of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test Version 2.0 (MSCEIT) ...
There has been some debate recently over the scoring, reliability and factor structure of ability me...
In 2 studies, we assessed the construct validity of the Italian version of the Mayer\u2013Salovey\u2...
A sample of 183 medical students completed the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSC...
Current measures of ability emotional intelligence (EI)--including the well-known Mayer-Salovey-Caru...
An unresolved but pertinent issue in the field of emotional intelligence (EI) is factorial validity....
Research to-date on the dimensionality of the Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence (SSREI; Sch...
In two studies, we assessed the construct validity of the Italian version of the Mayer-Salovey-Carus...
Despite the popularity of the concept of emotional intelligence (EI) in recent years, several resear...
The criterion groups validity of emotional intelligence according to Mayer & Salovey (1997), abi...
This thesis presents the results from three papers assessing the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Carus...
Notwithstanding the wide use of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form (TEIQue-SF...
Since Salovey and Mayer's (1990) seminal article on emotional intelligence(EI), the construct has re...
We address concerns raised by Maul (2012) regarding the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotion...
Replies to comments made by G. E. Gignac on the current authors\u27 original article . Gignac reanal...
The internal structure of the Mayer–Salovey–Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test Version 2.0 (MSCEIT) ...
There has been some debate recently over the scoring, reliability and factor structure of ability me...
In 2 studies, we assessed the construct validity of the Italian version of the Mayer\u2013Salovey\u2...
A sample of 183 medical students completed the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test (MSC...
Current measures of ability emotional intelligence (EI)--including the well-known Mayer-Salovey-Caru...
An unresolved but pertinent issue in the field of emotional intelligence (EI) is factorial validity....
Research to-date on the dimensionality of the Schutte Self-Report Emotional Intelligence (SSREI; Sch...
In two studies, we assessed the construct validity of the Italian version of the Mayer-Salovey-Carus...
Despite the popularity of the concept of emotional intelligence (EI) in recent years, several resear...
The criterion groups validity of emotional intelligence according to Mayer & Salovey (1997), abi...
This thesis presents the results from three papers assessing the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Carus...
Notwithstanding the wide use of the Trait Emotional Intelligence Questionnaire-Short Form (TEIQue-SF...
Since Salovey and Mayer's (1990) seminal article on emotional intelligence(EI), the construct has re...
We address concerns raised by Maul (2012) regarding the validity of the Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotion...
Replies to comments made by G. E. Gignac on the current authors\u27 original article . Gignac reanal...