So which is it? Is research a mistake for art or is art a mistake for research? These two questions complement each other. They both encourage the view of a compromise or limitation in the maintenance of art as we know it or research as we know it. The former position, that ‘research is a mistake for art’ is most usually expressed from within the art and design sector. The latter position, that ‘art is a mistake for research’ from outside the art and design sector. Neither of these positions accepts the idea of research as part of a national or global apparatus of art and design, in other words as a part of the totality of social, material, economic, discursive and institutional determinants of a practice. My talk will examine whether gover...
With the move towards inclusion of the arts as part of the larger university system, has come the pr...
Artistic research continues to be the subject of many extended and often somewhat affected debates. ...
This article addresses how 'new knowledge’ still remains a contested field. It considers how a new r...
Looking back to the Arts and Humanities Research Board’s (AHRB) September 2003 Response to Consultat...
This article reflects on the worth of the arts in an academic context partly in the light of the aut...
In 2005 the Arts and Humanities Research Council initiated a review of practice-led research in art,...
An exploration of the nature of research in art and design. What constitutes research in these field...
In 1993 Christopher Frayling, the Rector of the Royal College of Art in London, published an article...
Ongoing change in both the university sector as a whole and within individual universities in relati...
Following the integration of artistic disciplines within the university, artists have been challenge...
In 2005 the Arts and Humanities Research Council initiated a review of practice-led research in art,...
Artistic research output struggles for recognition as 'legitimate' research within the highly-compet...
Michael Biggs, ‘Doctorateness: where should we look for evidence?’, in Fredrik Nilsson, Halina Dunin...
Testing, Testing is an exhibition, book, symposium and second book by PhD practice-based researchers...
Recent history has seen a global shift towards the arts as part of larger university systems, but wi...
With the move towards inclusion of the arts as part of the larger university system, has come the pr...
Artistic research continues to be the subject of many extended and often somewhat affected debates. ...
This article addresses how 'new knowledge’ still remains a contested field. It considers how a new r...
Looking back to the Arts and Humanities Research Board’s (AHRB) September 2003 Response to Consultat...
This article reflects on the worth of the arts in an academic context partly in the light of the aut...
In 2005 the Arts and Humanities Research Council initiated a review of practice-led research in art,...
An exploration of the nature of research in art and design. What constitutes research in these field...
In 1993 Christopher Frayling, the Rector of the Royal College of Art in London, published an article...
Ongoing change in both the university sector as a whole and within individual universities in relati...
Following the integration of artistic disciplines within the university, artists have been challenge...
In 2005 the Arts and Humanities Research Council initiated a review of practice-led research in art,...
Artistic research output struggles for recognition as 'legitimate' research within the highly-compet...
Michael Biggs, ‘Doctorateness: where should we look for evidence?’, in Fredrik Nilsson, Halina Dunin...
Testing, Testing is an exhibition, book, symposium and second book by PhD practice-based researchers...
Recent history has seen a global shift towards the arts as part of larger university systems, but wi...
With the move towards inclusion of the arts as part of the larger university system, has come the pr...
Artistic research continues to be the subject of many extended and often somewhat affected debates. ...
This article addresses how 'new knowledge’ still remains a contested field. It considers how a new r...