Examines the Supreme Court decision in R. (on the application of Buckinghamshire CC) v Secretary of State for Transport on whether the process for passing the Bill authorising plans for the high-speed rail network (HS2) would breach Directive 2011/92 (Environmental Impact Assessment Directive) art.1(4) as the Bill would be subject to a whipped rather than a free vote. Analyses the constitutional law issues raised in the case, including: (1) the supremacy of EU law principle; (2) the court's relationship with the European Court of Justice; and (3) the recognition of constitutional instruments
This article examines the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in RMT v United Kingdom1 on the c...
The Supreme Court’s ruling against the government is measured and restrained in tone – but it is the...
Constitutional system of the United Kingdom is seldom a theme of interest in domestic academic debat...
Examines the Supreme Court decision in R. (on the application of Buckinghamshire CC) v Secretary of ...
In R. (Buckinghamshire CC) v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] UKSC 3; [2014] 1 W.L.R. 324 (HS...
The impact of EU membership on the UK constitution has been profound. In the Miller (Article 50) cas...
In R (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and others) v Heathrow Airport Ltd the UK Supre...
In today’s Brexit decision, the High Court has delivered a tutorial on the UK constitution, ex...
The United Kingdom Supreme Court (UKSC) is a relatively new supreme court, as it started to sit as r...
Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading expert...
The Hyundai-inspired interpretation obliges the courts to interpret, where possible, legislation in ...
Assesses the constitutional authority of the Supreme Court compared with that of the Appellate Commi...
The aim of this paper is to explore the role of judicial review of legislation in the UK from a lega...
This Article compares the implementation of EMU law with the framework governing the implementation ...
Comments on the constitutional issues raised by decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Hi...
This article examines the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in RMT v United Kingdom1 on the c...
The Supreme Court’s ruling against the government is measured and restrained in tone – but it is the...
Constitutional system of the United Kingdom is seldom a theme of interest in domestic academic debat...
Examines the Supreme Court decision in R. (on the application of Buckinghamshire CC) v Secretary of ...
In R. (Buckinghamshire CC) v Secretary of State for Transport [2014] UKSC 3; [2014] 1 W.L.R. 324 (HS...
The impact of EU membership on the UK constitution has been profound. In the Miller (Article 50) cas...
In R (on the application of Friends of the Earth Ltd and others) v Heathrow Airport Ltd the UK Supre...
In today’s Brexit decision, the High Court has delivered a tutorial on the UK constitution, ex...
The United Kingdom Supreme Court (UKSC) is a relatively new supreme court, as it started to sit as r...
Judicial Reasoning under the UK Human Rights Act is a collection of essays written by leading expert...
The Hyundai-inspired interpretation obliges the courts to interpret, where possible, legislation in ...
Assesses the constitutional authority of the Supreme Court compared with that of the Appellate Commi...
The aim of this paper is to explore the role of judicial review of legislation in the UK from a lega...
This Article compares the implementation of EMU law with the framework governing the implementation ...
Comments on the constitutional issues raised by decision of the European Court of Human Rights in Hi...
This article examines the European Court of Human Rights’ decision in RMT v United Kingdom1 on the c...
The Supreme Court’s ruling against the government is measured and restrained in tone – but it is the...
Constitutional system of the United Kingdom is seldom a theme of interest in domestic academic debat...