BACKGROUND: Adequate lymph node (LN) assessment and R0 resection are critical to the staging and management of gastric cancer. The American Joint Committee on Cancer/International Union Against Cancer recommend at least 15 LN be assessed, and the literature suggests a gross disease-free margin of 5-6 cm be achieved. Results of an Ontario general surgeons' survey indicated these standards were not widely known. Because disease management is highly collaborative, we surveyed pathologists to assess their knowledge of LN assessment and margins for processing gastric cancer specimens. METHODS: Pathologists were identified by the College of Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario and MD Select databases. Participants were surveyed online or by mail. R...
The downstaging of gastric cancer has recently gained particular attention in the field of gastric c...
Objective: To qualify surgeons to participate in a randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open ...
Objective: Defining processes of care, which are appropriate and necessary for management of gastric...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Research into surgeon and pathologist knowledge of guidelines for lymph n...
Abstract: Short-term results of gastric cancer surgery vary remarkably worldwide, and international ...
BACKGROUND: Short-term results of gastric cancer surgery vary remarkably worldwide, and internat...
Background: Short-term results of gastric cancer surgery vary remarkably worldwide, and internationa...
Objective: knowledge regarding prognostic factors in gastric cancer is essential to decide on single...
BACKGROUND Quality assurance is increasingly acknowledged as a crucial factor for the (surgical) tre...
Background: histopathological outcomes, such as lymph node yield and margin positivity, are used to ...
Objective: The lymph node number as benchmark in oncologic operations depends on the patient's anato...
Background: Variation in the approach, radicality, and quality of gastroesophageal surgery impacts p...
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgicopathological quality and protocol adhere...
The downstaging of gastric cancer has recently gained particular attention in the field of gastric c...
The downstaging of gastric cancer has recently gained particular attention in the field of gastric c...
Objective: To qualify surgeons to participate in a randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open ...
Objective: Defining processes of care, which are appropriate and necessary for management of gastric...
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Research into surgeon and pathologist knowledge of guidelines for lymph n...
Abstract: Short-term results of gastric cancer surgery vary remarkably worldwide, and international ...
BACKGROUND: Short-term results of gastric cancer surgery vary remarkably worldwide, and internat...
Background: Short-term results of gastric cancer surgery vary remarkably worldwide, and internationa...
Objective: knowledge regarding prognostic factors in gastric cancer is essential to decide on single...
BACKGROUND Quality assurance is increasingly acknowledged as a crucial factor for the (surgical) tre...
Background: histopathological outcomes, such as lymph node yield and margin positivity, are used to ...
Objective: The lymph node number as benchmark in oncologic operations depends on the patient's anato...
Background: Variation in the approach, radicality, and quality of gastroesophageal surgery impacts p...
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate surgicopathological quality and protocol adhere...
The downstaging of gastric cancer has recently gained particular attention in the field of gastric c...
The downstaging of gastric cancer has recently gained particular attention in the field of gastric c...
Objective: To qualify surgeons to participate in a randomized trial comparing laparoscopic and open ...
Objective: Defining processes of care, which are appropriate and necessary for management of gastric...