In a recent article, Jim Stone argues that counterpart theory and four-dimensionalism are incompatible. His arguments carry no obvious weight against the stage view defended by Sider. Nor do they undermine the more vulnerable combination of the worm view and counterpart theory – or so I argue.Citation: Eagle, A. (2007). Reply to Stone on counterpart theory and four-dimensionalism. Analysis [Online], 67 (294), 159–162. The definitive version is available at www.blackwell-synergy.co
This paper raises and defends three classes of objections to Ted Sider\u27s argument from vagueness ...
David Lewis ’ modal counterpart theory falls prey to the famous Saul Kripke’s objection, and this is...
Mark Johnston has recently argued that four-dimensionalist theories of persistence are incompatible ...
“The truth, ” Quine says, “is that you can bathe in the same river twice, but not in the same river ...
I argue that two competing accounts of persistence, three and four dimensionalism, are in fact metap...
Three-dimensionalism is the view that persisting objects are \u27wholly present\u27 whenever they ex...
I argue that two competing accounts of persistence, three and four dimensionalism, are in fact metap...
dimensionalism – the doctrine of temporal parts – follows from several other premises, chief among w...
In this essay for a PPR book symposium on Theodore Sider's _Four-Dimensionalism , I focus on two of ...
Persistence through time is like extension through space. A road has spatial parts in the subregions...
Fabrizio Mondadori: Counterpartese, Counterpartese*, Counterpartesen · «Counterpartese, Counterparte...
Nonreductive physicalism faces serious problems regarding causal exclusion, causal heterogeneity, an...
David Lewis argues at length against haecceitism and goes as far as claiming that, on a certain coun...
This dissertation consists in the motivation, formal development, and partial defence of a novel the...
This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Oxford Stu...
This paper raises and defends three classes of objections to Ted Sider\u27s argument from vagueness ...
David Lewis ’ modal counterpart theory falls prey to the famous Saul Kripke’s objection, and this is...
Mark Johnston has recently argued that four-dimensionalist theories of persistence are incompatible ...
“The truth, ” Quine says, “is that you can bathe in the same river twice, but not in the same river ...
I argue that two competing accounts of persistence, three and four dimensionalism, are in fact metap...
Three-dimensionalism is the view that persisting objects are \u27wholly present\u27 whenever they ex...
I argue that two competing accounts of persistence, three and four dimensionalism, are in fact metap...
dimensionalism – the doctrine of temporal parts – follows from several other premises, chief among w...
In this essay for a PPR book symposium on Theodore Sider's _Four-Dimensionalism , I focus on two of ...
Persistence through time is like extension through space. A road has spatial parts in the subregions...
Fabrizio Mondadori: Counterpartese, Counterpartese*, Counterpartesen · «Counterpartese, Counterparte...
Nonreductive physicalism faces serious problems regarding causal exclusion, causal heterogeneity, an...
David Lewis argues at length against haecceitism and goes as far as claiming that, on a certain coun...
This dissertation consists in the motivation, formal development, and partial defence of a novel the...
This is a pre-copy-editing, author-produced PDF of an article accepted for publication in Oxford Stu...
This paper raises and defends three classes of objections to Ted Sider\u27s argument from vagueness ...
David Lewis ’ modal counterpart theory falls prey to the famous Saul Kripke’s objection, and this is...
Mark Johnston has recently argued that four-dimensionalist theories of persistence are incompatible ...
DOI
Add to ORKG