Systematic reviews carried out by Cochrane Collaboration (an international network of researchers belonging to this independent, not-for-profit organization) are recognized worldwide as the highest standard in evidence-based healthcare. The main reason is that Cochrane reviews follow a common and specific methodology to limit bias and random error. In this issue, we highlight the most important methodological features of Cochrane reviews, also reporting details on the editorial process to publish the review in the Cochrane Library
Abstract Background Producing high-quality, relevant systematic reviews and keeping them up to date ...
Rationale and aim Over the past 12 years, thousands of authors working with the Cochrane Collaborati...
is the conduct of systematic reviews dealing with important health care questions. It is the policy ...
Systematic reviews carried out by Cochrane Collaboration (an international network of researchers be...
Systematic reviews carried out by Cochrane Collaboration (an international network of researchers be...
This year, The Cochrane Collaboration reached its 20th anniversary. It has played a pivotal role in ...
International audience: This year, The Cochrane Collaboration reached its 20th anniversary. It has p...
Undertaking a Cochrane systematic review can be an incred-ibly rewarding experience. It is however a...
Objective: To assess the quality of Cochrane reviews. Design: Ten methodologists affiliated with...
Users can view and download reviews of scientific studies pertaining to interventions for specific i...
Background: Producing high-quality, relevant systematic reviews and keeping them up to date is chall...
The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official guide that describes i...
identifies an intervention for a specific disease (or other problem in health care) and determines w...
In the current information age, research synthesis is a particularly useful tool for keeping track o...
This paper reviews Cochrane Collaboration and its structure. The authors explain the concepts of sys...
Abstract Background Producing high-quality, relevant systematic reviews and keeping them up to date ...
Rationale and aim Over the past 12 years, thousands of authors working with the Cochrane Collaborati...
is the conduct of systematic reviews dealing with important health care questions. It is the policy ...
Systematic reviews carried out by Cochrane Collaboration (an international network of researchers be...
Systematic reviews carried out by Cochrane Collaboration (an international network of researchers be...
This year, The Cochrane Collaboration reached its 20th anniversary. It has played a pivotal role in ...
International audience: This year, The Cochrane Collaboration reached its 20th anniversary. It has p...
Undertaking a Cochrane systematic review can be an incred-ibly rewarding experience. It is however a...
Objective: To assess the quality of Cochrane reviews. Design: Ten methodologists affiliated with...
Users can view and download reviews of scientific studies pertaining to interventions for specific i...
Background: Producing high-quality, relevant systematic reviews and keeping them up to date is chall...
The Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions is the official guide that describes i...
identifies an intervention for a specific disease (or other problem in health care) and determines w...
In the current information age, research synthesis is a particularly useful tool for keeping track o...
This paper reviews Cochrane Collaboration and its structure. The authors explain the concepts of sys...
Abstract Background Producing high-quality, relevant systematic reviews and keeping them up to date ...
Rationale and aim Over the past 12 years, thousands of authors working with the Cochrane Collaborati...
is the conduct of systematic reviews dealing with important health care questions. It is the policy ...