Even though randomised controlled trials are the design of choice for evaluating the efficacy of health care interventions, they are not immune to bias that may affect research process and validity of results. In the present paper we discussed how trial quality may be appraised considering both whether a clinical trial is reported in a comprehensive and complete way (consistently with what had been declared in the study protocol), and whether the characteristics of the trial itself are associated with risk of bias
<p>L: low risk (methods were indicated and proper); H: high risk (methods were indicated but imprope...
*<p>Domains of quality assessment based on Cochrane tools for assessing risk of bias.</p><p>L, low r...
Objective: It has been suggested that randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of health behaviour change...
Abstract. Even though randomised controlled trials are the design of choice for evaluating the effic...
To evaluate the reliability of risk of bias assessments based on published trial reports, for determ...
BACKGROUND: Evidence based medicine aims to integrate scientific evidence, clinical experience, and ...
<p>*Yes, low risk of bias; Unclear, unclear risk of bias; No, high risk of bias.</p
OBJECTIVES To establish whether items included in instruments published in the last decade assess...
Background & Objectives: Randomized controlled trials are the most reliable type of study to be able...
Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Risk of bias asses...
<p>‘Risk of bias’ tool was used as described in the Cochrane Handbook. Studies were classified as lo...
A) Risk of bias in each domain of individual trials and B) Risk of bias across all included trials. ...
Flaws in the design of randomized trials may bias intervention effect estimates and increase between...
Risk of bias quality assessment using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool applied to the ne...
BACKGROUND: Evidence based medicine aims to integrate scientific evidence, clinical experience, and ...
<p>L: low risk (methods were indicated and proper); H: high risk (methods were indicated but imprope...
*<p>Domains of quality assessment based on Cochrane tools for assessing risk of bias.</p><p>L, low r...
Objective: It has been suggested that randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of health behaviour change...
Abstract. Even though randomised controlled trials are the design of choice for evaluating the effic...
To evaluate the reliability of risk of bias assessments based on published trial reports, for determ...
BACKGROUND: Evidence based medicine aims to integrate scientific evidence, clinical experience, and ...
<p>*Yes, low risk of bias; Unclear, unclear risk of bias; No, high risk of bias.</p
OBJECTIVES To establish whether items included in instruments published in the last decade assess...
Background & Objectives: Randomized controlled trials are the most reliable type of study to be able...
Quality assessment was conducted using the Cochrane risk of bias assessment tool. Risk of bias asses...
<p>‘Risk of bias’ tool was used as described in the Cochrane Handbook. Studies were classified as lo...
A) Risk of bias in each domain of individual trials and B) Risk of bias across all included trials. ...
Flaws in the design of randomized trials may bias intervention effect estimates and increase between...
Risk of bias quality assessment using the Cochrane Collaboration risk-of-bias tool applied to the ne...
BACKGROUND: Evidence based medicine aims to integrate scientific evidence, clinical experience, and ...
<p>L: low risk (methods were indicated and proper); H: high risk (methods were indicated but imprope...
*<p>Domains of quality assessment based on Cochrane tools for assessing risk of bias.</p><p>L, low r...
Objective: It has been suggested that randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of health behaviour change...