Methods to assess the risk of bias in a way that is reliable, reproducible. and transparent to readers, have evolved over time. Viswanathan et al. recently provided updated recommendations for assessing risk of bias in systematic reviews of health care interventions. We comment on their recommendations and discuss new tools in development that we, as co-convenors and coordinators of the Cochrane Bias Methods Group, are leading, which complement the methods recommended
OBJECTIVES To assess the changes in the risk of bias (RoB) across different versions of the same ...
<p>Based on the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias, + indicates low risk of bi...
International audienceThe objective of the study was to develop and validate an adequate tool to eva...
Methods to assess the risk of bias in a way that is reliable, reproducible. and transparent to reade...
Abstract Background Assessing the risk of bias in individual studies in a systematic review can be d...
<p>This figure was the summery for risk of bias within six studies. It was formed using Revman 5.2. ...
A systematic review identifies, appraises and synthesises all the empirical evidence from studies th...
BACKGROUND: Evidence based medicine aims to integrate scientific evidence, clinical experience, and ...
<p>This table was formed using Revman 5.2. The definition of sources of bias and methods of assessin...
Abstract Risk of bias in translational medicine may take one of three forms: A. a systematic error o...
Abstract Authors of Cochrane reviews are expected to update their reviews every 2 year...
Abstract Background Different tools exist for assessing risk of bias of intervention studies for sys...
<p>Risk of bias: systematic review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as per...
Background Several scales, checklists and domain-based tools for assessing risk of reporting biases ...
In the course of performing systematic reviews on the prevalence of low back and neck pain, we requi...
OBJECTIVES To assess the changes in the risk of bias (RoB) across different versions of the same ...
<p>Based on the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias, + indicates low risk of bi...
International audienceThe objective of the study was to develop and validate an adequate tool to eva...
Methods to assess the risk of bias in a way that is reliable, reproducible. and transparent to reade...
Abstract Background Assessing the risk of bias in individual studies in a systematic review can be d...
<p>This figure was the summery for risk of bias within six studies. It was formed using Revman 5.2. ...
A systematic review identifies, appraises and synthesises all the empirical evidence from studies th...
BACKGROUND: Evidence based medicine aims to integrate scientific evidence, clinical experience, and ...
<p>This table was formed using Revman 5.2. The definition of sources of bias and methods of assessin...
Abstract Risk of bias in translational medicine may take one of three forms: A. a systematic error o...
Abstract Authors of Cochrane reviews are expected to update their reviews every 2 year...
Abstract Background Different tools exist for assessing risk of bias of intervention studies for sys...
<p>Risk of bias: systematic review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as per...
Background Several scales, checklists and domain-based tools for assessing risk of reporting biases ...
In the course of performing systematic reviews on the prevalence of low back and neck pain, we requi...
OBJECTIVES To assess the changes in the risk of bias (RoB) across different versions of the same ...
<p>Based on the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias, + indicates low risk of bi...
International audienceThe objective of the study was to develop and validate an adequate tool to eva...