The use of criteria in historical Jesus research gives the enterprise an appearance of scientific objectivity that may be deceptive. A particular case in point is the use of multiple attestation to establish the near certainty that the historical Jesus was a healer and exorcist (as, for example, J.P. Meier argues). Logically, there is little reason why multiple attestation alone should indicate historical reliability, and there may not be as many useful independent sources for Jesus' miracles as Meier supposes. Jesus may well have been a healer and exorcist, but if so, this needs to be established on other grounds. © 2005 SAGE Publications
<strong>The Jesus of history: Hermeneutic premises in the research of JP Meier. </strong>...
One of the most distinctive characteristics of current research into the life of Jesus, sometimes re...
Since the most important sources for our knowledge are the Synoptic Gospels (esp. Mark and Q), histo...
The use of criteria in historical Jesus research gives the enterprise an appearance of scientific ob...
The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existe...
This is the second article in a series of two that discusses whether historians are within their pro...
Recent discussions of method in historical Jesus research have called into question the use of crite...
Criteria of authenticity, whose roots go back to before the pioneering work of Albert Schweitzer, ha...
<strong>The historical Jesus as miracle worker</strong><br /> This paper deals wit...
Most Biblical scholars and historians hold that the investigation of a miracle report lies outside o...
<strong>The Jesus of history: A citical relection on J P Meier's Jesus-proile.</strong> ...
An unbroken belief stretches from earliest Hebrew times to the present century that supernatural kno...
In this thesis, I argue that Mark undergirds his high view of Jesus by characterizing him as an aut...
If Jesus's resurrection did not happen, the Christian faith is falsified. The question is there...
Historical Jesus research is in a crisis that mostly goes unnoticed. It can be seen in the prolifera...
<strong>The Jesus of history: Hermeneutic premises in the research of JP Meier. </strong>...
One of the most distinctive characteristics of current research into the life of Jesus, sometimes re...
Since the most important sources for our knowledge are the Synoptic Gospels (esp. Mark and Q), histo...
The use of criteria in historical Jesus research gives the enterprise an appearance of scientific ob...
The vast majority of Biblical historians believe there is evidence sufficient to place Jesus’ existe...
This is the second article in a series of two that discusses whether historians are within their pro...
Recent discussions of method in historical Jesus research have called into question the use of crite...
Criteria of authenticity, whose roots go back to before the pioneering work of Albert Schweitzer, ha...
<strong>The historical Jesus as miracle worker</strong><br /> This paper deals wit...
Most Biblical scholars and historians hold that the investigation of a miracle report lies outside o...
<strong>The Jesus of history: A citical relection on J P Meier's Jesus-proile.</strong> ...
An unbroken belief stretches from earliest Hebrew times to the present century that supernatural kno...
In this thesis, I argue that Mark undergirds his high view of Jesus by characterizing him as an aut...
If Jesus's resurrection did not happen, the Christian faith is falsified. The question is there...
Historical Jesus research is in a crisis that mostly goes unnoticed. It can be seen in the prolifera...
<strong>The Jesus of history: Hermeneutic premises in the research of JP Meier. </strong>...
One of the most distinctive characteristics of current research into the life of Jesus, sometimes re...
Since the most important sources for our knowledge are the Synoptic Gospels (esp. Mark and Q), histo...