Comparative analysis of Czech and French constitutional regulation of the Presidency and analysis of relevant legal terminology

The primary goal of this work is to confirm or disprove the hypothesis that the French president has, in the contemporary constitutional framework, a stronger position than the Czech one. Its secondary goal is to define and specify the relevant terminology of this field of law. This work is divided into four chapters. The first two describe the presidential institution from three different points of view: the creation of their mandates, the mandates themselves and presidential powers. The first one discusses the situation in the Czech Republic; the second in France. The third and principal chapter of this work is dedicated to the comparison of the Czech and the French presidential institution. We compare them to the same viewpoints as described in chapters one and two. The fourth and final chapter analyses the language used in this field of French law, especially with regards to Czech translations. A non-exhaustive glossary of French-Czech vocabulary used in the work can be found at the end of this chapter. The work concludes with a French résumé