The paper compares two main types of factorization of belief functions (one based on the Dempster´s rule of combination, the other based on the operator of composition) and shows that both the approaches are equivalent to each other in case of unconditional factorization and shows what are the differences when overlapping factorization is studied
When combining belief functions by the conjunctive rules of combination, conflicts often appear, whi...
AbstractThis article tries to clarify some aspects of the theory of belief functions especially with...
Dempster’s rule of combination, the main inference mechanism of the Dempster-Shafer theory of belief...
Abstract. Practically all methods for efficient computation with multidimensional models take advant...
International audienceWhen merging belief functions, Dempster rule of combination is justified only ...
Abstract. When merging belief functions, Dempster rule of combina-tion is justified only when inform...
MinC combination of belief functions - an instance of combination per elements is recalled in order ...
AbstractThis paper considers the problem of combining belief functions obtained from not necessarily...
Dempster’s rule is traditionally interpreted as an operator for fusing belief functions. While there...
International audienceWhen merging belief functions, Dempster rule of combination is justified only ...
The conjunctive weight function is an equivalent repre-sentation of a non dogmatic belief function. ...
Dempster’s rule for combining two belief functions assumes the indepen-dence of the sources of infor...
Dempster's Rule is commonly described as an operator for fusing beliefs. While there are differ...
We consider uncertain data which uncertainty is represented by belief functions and that must be com...
Abstract. When merging belief functions, Dempster rule of combina-tion is justified only when source...
When combining belief functions by the conjunctive rules of combination, conflicts often appear, whi...
AbstractThis article tries to clarify some aspects of the theory of belief functions especially with...
Dempster’s rule of combination, the main inference mechanism of the Dempster-Shafer theory of belief...
Abstract. Practically all methods for efficient computation with multidimensional models take advant...
International audienceWhen merging belief functions, Dempster rule of combination is justified only ...
Abstract. When merging belief functions, Dempster rule of combina-tion is justified only when inform...
MinC combination of belief functions - an instance of combination per elements is recalled in order ...
AbstractThis paper considers the problem of combining belief functions obtained from not necessarily...
Dempster’s rule is traditionally interpreted as an operator for fusing belief functions. While there...
International audienceWhen merging belief functions, Dempster rule of combination is justified only ...
The conjunctive weight function is an equivalent repre-sentation of a non dogmatic belief function. ...
Dempster’s rule for combining two belief functions assumes the indepen-dence of the sources of infor...
Dempster's Rule is commonly described as an operator for fusing beliefs. While there are differ...
We consider uncertain data which uncertainty is represented by belief functions and that must be com...
Abstract. When merging belief functions, Dempster rule of combina-tion is justified only when source...
When combining belief functions by the conjunctive rules of combination, conflicts often appear, whi...
AbstractThis article tries to clarify some aspects of the theory of belief functions especially with...
Dempster’s rule of combination, the main inference mechanism of the Dempster-Shafer theory of belief...