Add to ORKGWith the passage of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (F.A.C.E.), and the Supreme Court’s decision in NOW v. Scheidler, pro-life activists who engage in civil disobedience will suffer far greater legal disabilities than have been placed upon other protest movements in American history. But following Madsen, pro-life demonstrators can now take advantage of protections not previously articulated by the Court. So long as they do not engage in repetitive illegalities, pro-life demonstrators can count on strong First Amendment guarantees
This note will discuss the new standard introduced by the United States Supreme Court, the Court\u27...
The first amendment has long protected a complex and interwoven range of individual interests. Prote...
This Article uses the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit’s divided decision in Otto v. C...
With the passage of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (F.A.C.E.), and the Supreme Court’...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that an injunction providing for a fixed buffer zone a...
Recently, in Madsen v. Women\u27s Health Center, the United States Supreme Court evaluated the const...
Part I of this Article discusses the development of Supreme Court doctrine regarding First Amendment...
The editors responsible for today\u27s symposium have posed an alarming question: whether we are wit...
The U.S. Supreme Court has shown a notable willingness to reconsider — and depart from — its First A...
The Breeze is the student newspaper of James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia
This Article examines the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 First Amendment-based decisions in both National...
In Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, the Supreme Court’s first decision pitting First Amendment ri...
This Article uses the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit’s divided decision in Otto v. C...
In the classical era of the Civil Rights Movement in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, activists and prot...
The U.S. Constitution protects myriad, often intertwined, individual rights. Sometimes, protected fu...
This note will discuss the new standard introduced by the United States Supreme Court, the Court\u27...
The first amendment has long protected a complex and interwoven range of individual interests. Prote...
This Article uses the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit’s divided decision in Otto v. C...
With the passage of the Freedom of Access to Clinic Entrances Act (F.A.C.E.), and the Supreme Court’...
The Supreme Court of the United States held that an injunction providing for a fixed buffer zone a...
Recently, in Madsen v. Women\u27s Health Center, the United States Supreme Court evaluated the const...
Part I of this Article discusses the development of Supreme Court doctrine regarding First Amendment...
The editors responsible for today\u27s symposium have posed an alarming question: whether we are wit...
The U.S. Supreme Court has shown a notable willingness to reconsider — and depart from — its First A...
The Breeze is the student newspaper of James Madison University in Harrisonburg, Virginia
This Article examines the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 First Amendment-based decisions in both National...
In Holder v. Humanitarian Law Project, the Supreme Court’s first decision pitting First Amendment ri...
This Article uses the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit’s divided decision in Otto v. C...
In the classical era of the Civil Rights Movement in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s, activists and prot...
The U.S. Constitution protects myriad, often intertwined, individual rights. Sometimes, protected fu...
This note will discuss the new standard introduced by the United States Supreme Court, the Court\u27...
The first amendment has long protected a complex and interwoven range of individual interests. Prote...
This Article uses the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit’s divided decision in Otto v. C...