Add to ORKGRecordings have been offered in evidence in a wide variety of cases, including an attempted bribery of a draft board official, treasonous radio broadcasts, conspiracy to obstruct justice in a federal narcotics case, illegal short-wave radio transmissions aiding the illegal entry of Mexican nationals, disturbance to a motel by barking dogs in an adjoining pet hospital, and noises made by trains, planes, and a cement factory. Use by attorneys is virtually limitless, including the recording of discussions with clients, of library research, of depositions, and of wills
Entrepreneurs have manufactured unauthorized sound recordings since the\u27turn of the century. At f...
The United States Supreme Court was recently called upon to consider a novel aspect of the problem o...
Problems of Using as Evidence of an Audio Record Made Before the Pre-Trial Investigation Summary Aud...
Recordings have been offered in evidence in a wide variety of cases, including an attempted bribery ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has outlined the prohibitive reach of the wiretap statute as encom...
Appellant was indicted for conspiracy to violate the Bankruptcy Act. An agent of the Federal Bureau ...
In State v Williams, the Ohio Supreme Court addressed for the first time the issue of admissibility...
In a prosecution for conspiracy to violate the narcotic laws, defendant objected to the admission of...
“Sound Evidence” traces the historical appropriation of sound recording technologies in the United S...
Much of the history of the American law of evidence, including its most contentious issue, hearsay, ...
ON FEBRUARY 12, 1975, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit decided United States...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an audiotape played at a public preliminary criminal hearin...
Identification of individuals by the sound of their voices has long been an accepted courtroom pract...
Content note: The sound recording(s) associated with this repository item derive from a single audio...
The admissibility of the results of voiceprint\u27 analysis as evidence in a criminal trial has rece...
Entrepreneurs have manufactured unauthorized sound recordings since the\u27turn of the century. At f...
The United States Supreme Court was recently called upon to consider a novel aspect of the problem o...
Problems of Using as Evidence of an Audio Record Made Before the Pre-Trial Investigation Summary Aud...
Recordings have been offered in evidence in a wide variety of cases, including an attempted bribery ...
The Supreme Court of Pennsylvania has outlined the prohibitive reach of the wiretap statute as encom...
Appellant was indicted for conspiracy to violate the Bankruptcy Act. An agent of the Federal Bureau ...
In State v Williams, the Ohio Supreme Court addressed for the first time the issue of admissibility...
In a prosecution for conspiracy to violate the narcotic laws, defendant objected to the admission of...
“Sound Evidence” traces the historical appropriation of sound recording technologies in the United S...
Much of the history of the American law of evidence, including its most contentious issue, hearsay, ...
ON FEBRUARY 12, 1975, the United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit decided United States...
The Pennsylvania Supreme Court held that an audiotape played at a public preliminary criminal hearin...
Identification of individuals by the sound of their voices has long been an accepted courtroom pract...
Content note: The sound recording(s) associated with this repository item derive from a single audio...
The admissibility of the results of voiceprint\u27 analysis as evidence in a criminal trial has rece...
Entrepreneurs have manufactured unauthorized sound recordings since the\u27turn of the century. At f...
The United States Supreme Court was recently called upon to consider a novel aspect of the problem o...
Problems of Using as Evidence of an Audio Record Made Before the Pre-Trial Investigation Summary Aud...