This article will discuss technological capacity, an economic consideration to which some courts seem to give insubstantial consideration in challenges to section 7 of the Clayton Act. If courts consistently evaluated evidence of technological capacity, section 7 could be more effective in prohibiting mergers that have the effect of lessening competition in an economically significant market
The requirement that an antitrust plaintiff show market power in rule of reason cases has an uninspi...
Courts today permit private damages actions for illegal mergers under section 7 of the Clayton Act. ...
Considers (85) H.R. 7698, (85) H.R. 8682, (85) S. 198, (85) S. 721, (85) S. 722, (85) S. 3479.Consid...
This article will discuss technological capacity, an economic consideration to which some courts see...
Analyzing mergers between firms in a customer-supplier relationship under section 7 of the Clayton A...
A provision of the antitrust statutes currently receiving a great deal of publicity is the anti-merg...
Australian courts have gradually developed a more economics based approach to the interpretation of ...
The Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act (15 U.S.C. § 13), undertakes to outlaw price ...
Federal antitrust enforcement has undergone a radical transformation in the past decade. The change ...
It is the purpose of this Article to examine the Federal Trade Commission\u27s handling, in the Crow...
Section 7 of the Clayton Act, the basic antitrust law affecting mergers, today fails to promote comp...
Section 8 of the Clayton Act prohibits directorship and management interlocks between competing corp...
The legality of a proposed conglomerate joint venture is presently judged under Clayton Act section ...
Applications of Section 7 of the Clayton Act have been deficient in identifying and prohibiting anti...
Innovation may be described as the new religion of the 21st Century. The acceleration of technical c...
The requirement that an antitrust plaintiff show market power in rule of reason cases has an uninspi...
Courts today permit private damages actions for illegal mergers under section 7 of the Clayton Act. ...
Considers (85) H.R. 7698, (85) H.R. 8682, (85) S. 198, (85) S. 721, (85) S. 722, (85) S. 3479.Consid...
This article will discuss technological capacity, an economic consideration to which some courts see...
Analyzing mergers between firms in a customer-supplier relationship under section 7 of the Clayton A...
A provision of the antitrust statutes currently receiving a great deal of publicity is the anti-merg...
Australian courts have gradually developed a more economics based approach to the interpretation of ...
The Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act (15 U.S.C. § 13), undertakes to outlaw price ...
Federal antitrust enforcement has undergone a radical transformation in the past decade. The change ...
It is the purpose of this Article to examine the Federal Trade Commission\u27s handling, in the Crow...
Section 7 of the Clayton Act, the basic antitrust law affecting mergers, today fails to promote comp...
Section 8 of the Clayton Act prohibits directorship and management interlocks between competing corp...
The legality of a proposed conglomerate joint venture is presently judged under Clayton Act section ...
Applications of Section 7 of the Clayton Act have been deficient in identifying and prohibiting anti...
Innovation may be described as the new religion of the 21st Century. The acceleration of technical c...
The requirement that an antitrust plaintiff show market power in rule of reason cases has an uninspi...
Courts today permit private damages actions for illegal mergers under section 7 of the Clayton Act. ...
Considers (85) H.R. 7698, (85) H.R. 8682, (85) S. 198, (85) S. 721, (85) S. 722, (85) S. 3479.Consid...