Add to ORKGFor scholars of the First Amendment this case is an excellent example of the dilemmas posed by many of the doctrines created by the Court. While Justice Scalia proposes an elaborate and novel understanding of the limits of free speech regulation, Justice White responds with an assertion that Scalia\u27s reasoning is transparently wrong, and that his opinion is a radical revision of First Amendment law. According to Justice Stevens, the majority opinion is no more than an adventure in a doctrinal wonderland. Part II of this paper examines the attacks made by Justices White and Stevens against the majority opinion. Part III.A demonstrates a critical weakness in the majority opinion, one that reveals a perverse use of precedent by Justic...
The U.S. Supreme Court has shown a notable willingness to reconsider its First Amendment precedents....
This article contends that the Roberts Court, in the period from 2006 to 2016, arguably became the m...
This comment discusses four of Justice Stevens\u27s opinions that analyze first amendment issues. Tw...
For scholars of the First Amendment this case is an excellent example of the dilemmas posed by many ...
In the wake of Charlottesville, the rise of the alt-right, and campus controversies, the First Amend...
Since the Warren Court\u27s expansive construction of the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment,...
The U.S. Supreme Court has shown a notable willingness to reconsider — and depart from — its First A...
First Amendment interests in both speech and religion often collide with one another. A political ac...
First Amendment interests in both speech and religion often collide with one another. A political ac...
The standard account of the First Amendment presupposes that the Supreme Court has consistently expa...
In his three decades on the Supreme Court, Justice John Paul Stevens has developed a distinctive app...
In Managed Speech: The Roberts Court’s First Amendment, First Amendment scholar Gregory Magarian exp...
This piece is an edited transcript of Professor Strossen\u27s oral presentation on Religion and Pol...
This Article examines the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 First Amendment-based decisions in both National...
A First Amendment advocate\u27s greatest burden can be his own client. Those clients range from the ...
The U.S. Supreme Court has shown a notable willingness to reconsider its First Amendment precedents....
This article contends that the Roberts Court, in the period from 2006 to 2016, arguably became the m...
This comment discusses four of Justice Stevens\u27s opinions that analyze first amendment issues. Tw...
For scholars of the First Amendment this case is an excellent example of the dilemmas posed by many ...
In the wake of Charlottesville, the rise of the alt-right, and campus controversies, the First Amend...
Since the Warren Court\u27s expansive construction of the Free Speech Clause of the First Amendment,...
The U.S. Supreme Court has shown a notable willingness to reconsider — and depart from — its First A...
First Amendment interests in both speech and religion often collide with one another. A political ac...
First Amendment interests in both speech and religion often collide with one another. A political ac...
The standard account of the First Amendment presupposes that the Supreme Court has consistently expa...
In his three decades on the Supreme Court, Justice John Paul Stevens has developed a distinctive app...
In Managed Speech: The Roberts Court’s First Amendment, First Amendment scholar Gregory Magarian exp...
This piece is an edited transcript of Professor Strossen\u27s oral presentation on Religion and Pol...
This Article examines the U.S. Supreme Court’s 2018 First Amendment-based decisions in both National...
A First Amendment advocate\u27s greatest burden can be his own client. Those clients range from the ...
The U.S. Supreme Court has shown a notable willingness to reconsider its First Amendment precedents....
This article contends that the Roberts Court, in the period from 2006 to 2016, arguably became the m...
This comment discusses four of Justice Stevens\u27s opinions that analyze first amendment issues. Tw...