The article reviews recent cases and rulings dealing with the interplay of section 1041 with both (1) the assignment of income doctrine in the deferred compensation context and (2) the substance over form doctrine in the context of redemptions of closely held stock. The author argues that such doctrines, which attempt to avoid improper shifting of income between taxpayers, are inappropriate in the context of section 1041 transfers in light of the history and goals of that section. She believes that final regulations adopted under section 1041 should ensure that the form of transfers or redemptions negotiated by the parties dictates the resulting tax
This article questions the validity of Regulations section 1.502-1(b) and its resulting insistence u...
This article examines the theoretical aspects and issues of applying the principle of content over ...
This Article examines the treatment of the step-transaction doctrine in the United States and the Un...
The article reviews recent cases and rulings dealing with the interplay of section 1041 with both (1...
This article presents three principal theses: First, the courts and the Internal Revenue Service hav...
This article reviews the IRS and court usage of the substance over form doctrine to determine its ro...
In the interpretation of tax statutes, a venerable principle is that “taxation should move in an atm...
The enactment of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (hereinafter referred to as the 1981 Act ) w...
Section 7701(o) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) imports the judicial doctrine of e...
Whether income earned by an incorporated personal service business is taxable to the individual or t...
One well established feature of tax law is that, oftentimes, substance prevails over form. Therefore...
This article discusses the tension that exists between the recent textualist approach taken in the U...
This article examines statutory interpretation in general and the common-law doctrines at issue in p...
Over thirty years ago, Professor Ronald H. Jensen authored an article in the Virginia Tax Review, ti...
Early cases involving the government\u27s invocation of section 2036(a) to combat the use of family ...
This article questions the validity of Regulations section 1.502-1(b) and its resulting insistence u...
This article examines the theoretical aspects and issues of applying the principle of content over ...
This Article examines the treatment of the step-transaction doctrine in the United States and the Un...
The article reviews recent cases and rulings dealing with the interplay of section 1041 with both (1...
This article presents three principal theses: First, the courts and the Internal Revenue Service hav...
This article reviews the IRS and court usage of the substance over form doctrine to determine its ro...
In the interpretation of tax statutes, a venerable principle is that “taxation should move in an atm...
The enactment of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 (hereinafter referred to as the 1981 Act ) w...
Section 7701(o) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 (the “Code”) imports the judicial doctrine of e...
Whether income earned by an incorporated personal service business is taxable to the individual or t...
One well established feature of tax law is that, oftentimes, substance prevails over form. Therefore...
This article discusses the tension that exists between the recent textualist approach taken in the U...
This article examines statutory interpretation in general and the common-law doctrines at issue in p...
Over thirty years ago, Professor Ronald H. Jensen authored an article in the Virginia Tax Review, ti...
Early cases involving the government\u27s invocation of section 2036(a) to combat the use of family ...
This article questions the validity of Regulations section 1.502-1(b) and its resulting insistence u...
This article examines the theoretical aspects and issues of applying the principle of content over ...
This Article examines the treatment of the step-transaction doctrine in the United States and the Un...