Add to ORKGMapp v. Ohio: A Landmark Case in Cleveland History is a digital exhibit that includes case documents, audio files, photographs, summaries and news articles. The exhibit covers the case from the underlying facts to the United States Supreme Court decision 367 U.S. 643 (1961). The U.S. Supreme Court held that the exclusionary rule applied to the states. The exclusionary rule holds that evidence obtained in violation of defendants\u27 Fourth Amendment rights, such as evidence obtained without a warrant as required by the Fourth Amendment, must be excluded as evidence in the defendant\u27s criminal trial
On February 15, 1960, the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed petitioner\u27s conviction for simple bur...
In Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the Warren Court held that the so-called exclusionary rule was applicable to...
The defendant was in the unlawful possession of narcotics. Having been given a key by his two aunts ...
Mapp v. Ohio: A Landmark Case in Cleveland History is a digital exhibit that includes case documents...
In May 1957, Cleveland Police forced entry into Dollree Mapp\u27s home without a warrant. They were ...
On February 15, 1960, the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed petitioner\u27s conviction for simple bur...
At its inception, the exclusionary rule was relatively straightforward: The use at trial of evidence...
The rule announced in Mapp v. Ohio will not be used to overturn any conviction finally adjudicated b...
The purpose here is to examine critically the recent opinion of the United States Supreme Court in M...
People v. Loria, 10 N.Y.2d 368, 179 N.E.2d 478, 223 N.Y.S.2d 462 (Nov. 30 1961); People v. Coffey, 1...
Book review of "Mapp v. Ohio: Guarding Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures" by Carolyn N. Lon
Book review of "Mapp v. Ohio: Guarding Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures" by Carolyn N. Lon
[U]ntil the [exclusionary rule] rests on a principled basis rather than an empirical proposition, [t...
Book review of "The Supreme Court and the Fourth Amendment's Exclusionary Rule" by Tracey Macli
This report covers the legal causes and implications of Davis v. United States. The Supreme Court wi...
On February 15, 1960, the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed petitioner\u27s conviction for simple bur...
In Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the Warren Court held that the so-called exclusionary rule was applicable to...
The defendant was in the unlawful possession of narcotics. Having been given a key by his two aunts ...
Mapp v. Ohio: A Landmark Case in Cleveland History is a digital exhibit that includes case documents...
In May 1957, Cleveland Police forced entry into Dollree Mapp\u27s home without a warrant. They were ...
On February 15, 1960, the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed petitioner\u27s conviction for simple bur...
At its inception, the exclusionary rule was relatively straightforward: The use at trial of evidence...
The rule announced in Mapp v. Ohio will not be used to overturn any conviction finally adjudicated b...
The purpose here is to examine critically the recent opinion of the United States Supreme Court in M...
People v. Loria, 10 N.Y.2d 368, 179 N.E.2d 478, 223 N.Y.S.2d 462 (Nov. 30 1961); People v. Coffey, 1...
Book review of "Mapp v. Ohio: Guarding Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures" by Carolyn N. Lon
Book review of "Mapp v. Ohio: Guarding Against Unreasonable Searches and Seizures" by Carolyn N. Lon
[U]ntil the [exclusionary rule] rests on a principled basis rather than an empirical proposition, [t...
Book review of "The Supreme Court and the Fourth Amendment's Exclusionary Rule" by Tracey Macli
This report covers the legal causes and implications of Davis v. United States. The Supreme Court wi...
On February 15, 1960, the Louisiana Supreme Court affirmed petitioner\u27s conviction for simple bur...
In Mapp v. Ohio (1961), the Warren Court held that the so-called exclusionary rule was applicable to...
The defendant was in the unlawful possession of narcotics. Having been given a key by his two aunts ...