Congress did not correctly disestablish the Native American reservations in what is now the State of Oklahoma at the time of its rise to statehood according to the test created by the Supreme Court in Solem v. Bartlett (1984). This test requires that the Legislature include specific cession language in its enactments. This paper will examine the laws on the Oklahoma reservations. This examination will be used to argue that although Congress’ management of the First Nation peoples living in these enclaves may appear destructive by modern interpretations, none of the legislation formally terminated this area’s reservation status according to Supreme Court precedent
Removal of Indians to Indian Territory. [1935] Settlement of tribes in said territory should receive...
Attempts by state governments and the federal government to undermine Indian tribal sovereignty rema...
Reservation of the Turtle Mountain Chippewas. [2808] Bill authorizing negotiations for the surrender...
Congress did not correctly disestablish the Native American reservations in what is now the State of...
Report on Oklahoma Territory. [1659] Does not recommend the formation of a territorial government ov...
Hearings Before the Com. of Territories. 19 Feb. SMD 80, 50-2, v2, 56p. [2615] On the organization o...
Territory of Oklahoma. [1936] Establishment of a court in Indian Territory with jurisdiction over In...
Indians on the Colville Reservation. [2913] Bill to ratify an agreement with said Indians; Senator C...
This Article is the first of a two-part investigation into the Indian law doctrine of reservation di...
After the McGirt v. Oklahoma decision in 2020, Oklahoma’s statehood became the subject of intense le...
Report on Jurisdiction Over Indian Reservations. [1587] Amendments to a bill giving U.S. Courts excl...
R-M of the Alabama Legis. 18 Jan. HR 434, 25-2, v2, 2p. [334] Location of Creek and Choctaw reservat...
Report on Location of Indian Reservations. [315] Purchase of the Osage reservations of land under th...
The landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma has seen no shortage of scholarl...
Disposal of Cherokee Reservation in Arkansas. [2259] Land not a proper Indian reservation
Removal of Indians to Indian Territory. [1935] Settlement of tribes in said territory should receive...
Attempts by state governments and the federal government to undermine Indian tribal sovereignty rema...
Reservation of the Turtle Mountain Chippewas. [2808] Bill authorizing negotiations for the surrender...
Congress did not correctly disestablish the Native American reservations in what is now the State of...
Report on Oklahoma Territory. [1659] Does not recommend the formation of a territorial government ov...
Hearings Before the Com. of Territories. 19 Feb. SMD 80, 50-2, v2, 56p. [2615] On the organization o...
Territory of Oklahoma. [1936] Establishment of a court in Indian Territory with jurisdiction over In...
Indians on the Colville Reservation. [2913] Bill to ratify an agreement with said Indians; Senator C...
This Article is the first of a two-part investigation into the Indian law doctrine of reservation di...
After the McGirt v. Oklahoma decision in 2020, Oklahoma’s statehood became the subject of intense le...
Report on Jurisdiction Over Indian Reservations. [1587] Amendments to a bill giving U.S. Courts excl...
R-M of the Alabama Legis. 18 Jan. HR 434, 25-2, v2, 2p. [334] Location of Creek and Choctaw reservat...
Report on Location of Indian Reservations. [315] Purchase of the Osage reservations of land under th...
The landmark 2020 U.S. Supreme Court decision in McGirt v. Oklahoma has seen no shortage of scholarl...
Disposal of Cherokee Reservation in Arkansas. [2259] Land not a proper Indian reservation
Removal of Indians to Indian Territory. [1935] Settlement of tribes in said territory should receive...
Attempts by state governments and the federal government to undermine Indian tribal sovereignty rema...
Reservation of the Turtle Mountain Chippewas. [2808] Bill authorizing negotiations for the surrender...