Add to ORKGIn this dissertation we present a model for iteration of Katsuno and Mendelzon’s Update, inspired in the developments for iteration in AGM belief revision. We adapt Darwiche and Pearls’ postulates of iterated belief revision to update (as well as the independence postulate proposed in [BM06, JT07]) and show two families of such operators, based in natural [Bou96] and lexicographic revision [Nay94a, NPP03]. In all cases, we provide a possible worlds semantics of the models
International audienceBelief change within the framework of fragments of propo-sitional logic is one...
AbstractKatsuno and Mendelzon have distinguished two abstract frameworks for reasoning about change:...
International audienceThis paper deals with iterated belief change and proposes a revision rule that...
In this dissertation we present a model for iteration of Katsuno and Mendelzon’s Update, inspired in...
Abstract\ud Constructing models that allow for iterated changes is one of the most stu...
In this work, we address one important problem of Katsuno and Mendelzon update operators, that is to...
The AGM approach to belief change is not geared to provide a decent account of iterated belief chang...
International audienceWhile AGM belief revision identifies belief states with sets of formulas, prop...
Since they were introduced, AGM revision and Katsuno and Mendel-zon’s update have been considered es...
We provide a set of postulates that characterizes Katsuno and Men-delzon’s update operation [3] for ...
The behavior of Iterated Belief Revision operators with respect to iteration has been characterized ...
The classic AGM theory studies mathematically idealized models of belief revision in two aspects: th...
We provide a new characterization of both belief update and belief revision in terms of a Kripke-Lew...
This paper deals with iterated revision of partially ordered information. The first part of this pap...
AbstractThe Katsuno and Mendelzon (KM) theory of belief update has been proposed as a reasonable mod...
International audienceBelief change within the framework of fragments of propo-sitional logic is one...
AbstractKatsuno and Mendelzon have distinguished two abstract frameworks for reasoning about change:...
International audienceThis paper deals with iterated belief change and proposes a revision rule that...
In this dissertation we present a model for iteration of Katsuno and Mendelzon’s Update, inspired in...
Abstract\ud Constructing models that allow for iterated changes is one of the most stu...
In this work, we address one important problem of Katsuno and Mendelzon update operators, that is to...
The AGM approach to belief change is not geared to provide a decent account of iterated belief chang...
International audienceWhile AGM belief revision identifies belief states with sets of formulas, prop...
Since they were introduced, AGM revision and Katsuno and Mendel-zon’s update have been considered es...
We provide a set of postulates that characterizes Katsuno and Men-delzon’s update operation [3] for ...
The behavior of Iterated Belief Revision operators with respect to iteration has been characterized ...
The classic AGM theory studies mathematically idealized models of belief revision in two aspects: th...
We provide a new characterization of both belief update and belief revision in terms of a Kripke-Lew...
This paper deals with iterated revision of partially ordered information. The first part of this pap...
AbstractThe Katsuno and Mendelzon (KM) theory of belief update has been proposed as a reasonable mod...
International audienceBelief change within the framework of fragments of propo-sitional logic is one...
AbstractKatsuno and Mendelzon have distinguished two abstract frameworks for reasoning about change:...
International audienceThis paper deals with iterated belief change and proposes a revision rule that...